AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
86 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-2 NIWOtherJan 2023Dismissed
Pilot with advanced degree equivalent seeks NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding no demonstrated national importance for proposed pilot work. Working in important field and having professional qualifications insufficient; decision requires evidence of specific endeavor's impact on field as whole.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOtherJan 2023Dismissed
A pilot sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for aviation work. AAO dismissed the appeal, holding the petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate the national importance of his specific proposed endeavor as required by the first Dhanasar prong; general industry importance insufficient.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOther2023Dismissed
Aircraft mechanic seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability under EB-2 and that proposed endeavor lacks substantial merit and national importance, failing the first Dhanasar prong. Second and third prongs not addressed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOther2023Dismissed
Commercial captain sought NIW under EB-2 as advanced degree professional. Claimed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance addressing pilot shortage. AAO found record did not establish national importance of specific proposed work as individual pilot, lacking evidence of broader industry impact or individual contribution to resolving shortage.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOther2023Dismissed
Aircraft mechanic self-petitioner claimed exceptional ability under EB-2 and sought national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial because petitioner failed to establish by preponderance of evidence that expertise was significantly above ordinary in field, and thus did not qualify for underlying EB-2 classification required for NIW eligibility.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOtherDec 2022Dismissed
A petitioner claiming exceptional ability for security management proposed a waiver. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the EB-2 exceptional ability classification (not meeting three of six regulatory criteria) and provided inconsistent, insufficient evidence regarding the specific proposed endeavor required for national interest waiver analysis.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOtherNov 2022Dismissed
Pilot with advanced degree claimed NIW based on aviation industry pilot shortage and proposed flight instruction or academy work. AAO found proposed endeavor too vague with inconsistent job ideas to determine national importance, failing first Dhanasar prong.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOtherOct 2022Dismissed
A pilot sought a national interest waiver with EB-2 classification, proposing to work for U.S. airlines and train other pilots. The service center accepted the underlying classification but denied the waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance, and it did not reach the remaining prongs.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOtherOct 2021Dismissed
Project execution supervisor sought national interest waiver for EB-2 advanced degree. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed work lacks national importance despite meeting prong two; improvements limited to employer's projects without broader industry impact or demonstrated U.S. economic effects.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOtherSep 2021Dismissed
A professional with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for EB-2. The petitioner's motions to reopen and reconsider were dismissed because insufficient new evidence was presented. The AAO affirmed that letters of support and industry evidence did not establish the specific proposed endeavor had national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOtherAug 2021Dismissed
A petitioner proposed unspecified scientific activity and vendor machine development. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient specificity and clarity regarding substantial merit and national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.
0 of 3 criteria metRead →
