Published AAO appeal decisions

AI manufacturer petitioned for beneficiary's EB-2 national interest waiver. Beneficiary qualified for underlying EB-2 but failed NIW Dhanasar first prong; proposed work lacked demonstrated national importance and broader implications beyond company and clients.

A musician and music educator sought EB-2 immigrant classification with national interest waiver. SCOPS established advanced degree eligibility but denied the waiver. The AAO remanded because SCOPS failed to sufficiently analyze the three Dhanasar prongs and did not put the petitioner on notice of evidentiary deficiencies.

Civil engineer with Ph.D. sought NIW for research on structural reliability and truck platooning safety. AAO found endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to show he was well positioned to advance it or that waiving labor certification would benefit the nation.

Petitioner seeks NIW as EB-2 member with advanced degree, proposing to provide real estate consulting services through his company. SCOPS found substantial merit but denied national importance and waiver. AAO upheld dismissal, finding petitioner failed to demonstrate broader field or economic impact rising to national importance level.

Electrical engineer sought NIW for research on power grid efficiency and sustainability. AAO dismissed appeal because proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite alignment with climate goals, and evidence demonstrates past qualifications rather than prospective impact of specific proposed work.

Electrical engineer with doctoral degree proposes power grid research on renewable energy integration. AAO found substantial merit and national importance met, but rejected well-positioned prong due to insufficient evidence of research success and impact, and rejected balance prong as contributions do not outweigh labor certification benefits.

A systems engineering specialist and IT entrepreneur sought NIW classification for a software solutions consultancy firm. The AAO remanded because the service center misidentified the endeavor as language education, failed to analyze evidence regarding national importance, and provided insufficient explanation of its findings, preventing meaningful appellate review.

Employer-sponsored semiconductor engineer with master's degree seeks EB-2 national interest waiver for system-level test development work. Claimed endeavor has national importance due to semiconductor industry value and testing standard implications. AAO found importance of field insufficient; specific proposed endeavor lacks demonstrated broader prospective impact.

Software developer seeks NIW for EB-2 to develop universal AI architecture addressing bias in algorithms. AAO dismissed appeal, holding the specific proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite alignment with important AI field; merely working in an important industry insufficient.

Graduate student in epidemiology sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for research on cancer and aging-related diseases. AAO found the proposed research endeavor had national importance but dismissed the appeal because the petitioner, as a student without principal investigator experience or concrete evidence of pursuing postdoctoral employment, was not well-positioned to advance it.

Aging services manager with recent advanced degree seeks EB-2 NIW to advance elder care nationally. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to establish that proposed endeavor has national importance or that she is well-positioned to advance it; lacks innovation evidence, customer interest, or realized progress.

An electrical engineer with a foreign Master's degree sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed research endeavor lacks the national or global implications required to establish national importance, and the petitioner is not well-positioned to advance it.

Machine learning engineer sought EB-2 with NIW for AI-driven smart vehicle manufacturing research. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of the specific proposed endeavor, conflating field importance with endeavor-specific impact under Dhanasar's first prong.

An accountant with advanced degree sought NIW under EB-2. Service center analyzed wrong proposed endeavor (electrical engineering instead of financial consulting). AAO remanded because the denial did not address the petitioner's actual endeavor, noting the accountant's proposed financial consulting work likely does not meet Dhanasar's three prongs.

An entrepreneur in language education and cultural immersion training sought an EB-2 NIW. The AAO agreed the endeavor had merit but found it lacked the specific detail, evidence, and prospective impact necessary to establish national importance under Dhanasar's first prong, which is dispositive.

Computer science researcher with master's degree in statistics seeks EB-2 national interest waiver for AI-driven medical imaging and prediction models development. SCOPS improperly evaluated first prong by conflating proposed endeavor with petitioner's employment history and applying second-prong factors. AAO remanded for reconsideration of whether specific endeavor has prospective national importance.

A graduate student in biomedical engineering seeks NIW for research on photoacoustic imaging in clinical settings. The AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but dismissed because the petitioner did not demonstrate she is well-positioned to advance it, lacking a Ph.D., documented employment, or evidence of progress or investor interest.

Computer scientist with master's degree in engineering proposed advancing AI research in deep learning for data analysis and virtual assistants. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but petitioner is not well positioned to advance it due to insufficient record of success and impact. Appeal dismissed on second prong failure.

An artificial intelligence researcher sought EB-2 with national interest waiver without labor certification. The AAO affirmed the service center's finding that the proposed research endeavor lacked the substantial merit and national importance required under Dhanasar's first prong, dismissing the appeal.

Computer scientist employed as engineering associate proposed developing proprietary software for AI safety and trust. AAO affirmed denial because proposed work lacked national importance, benefiting only the specific employer despite national footprint, even though petitioner was well positioned.

Attorney specializing in intellectual property and cybercrime seeking EB-2 NIW proposed consulting business with claimed job creation and tax benefits. AAO dismissed, finding endeavor lacks sufficient national importance and evidence does not demonstrate broader impact on field beyond specific business and clients.

Secondary school teacher seeking NIW as EB-2 advanced degree professional to implement STEM program. Qualified for EB-2 but failed first Dhanasar prong: program benefits constrained to participating schools and students; scalability and alignment with federal priorities insufficient for national importance. Appeal dismissed.

AI robotics entrepreneur claims EB-2 exceptional ability. Petitioner meets advanced degree criterion but fails to meet three of six exceptional ability criteria required for classification. Bachelor's degree in aeronautics not demonstrated to relate to robotics endeavor. Comparable evidence for remaining criteria insufficient. Categorical ineligibility established; NIW not reached.

Graduate research assistant in cybersecurity sought EB-2 with NIW for autonomous vehicle security research. AAO found substantial merit but dismissed because petitioner failed to establish national importance of specific proposed endeavor or demonstrate being well-positioned to advance it under Dhanasar framework.

Physician-researcher proposing cancer research claims national interest waiver. AAO found first prong met: research has national importance. However, second prong failed: evidence from references lacked specific examples of research impact or progress, and citation metrics did not adequately demonstrate exceptional success.