Published AAO appeal decisions

Senior sourcing specialist sought national interest waiver as EB-2 advancing supply chain resilience and national security. Petitioner relied on field importance and federal priorities alignment. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance and insufficient evidence of well-positioning to advance it.

Founder and president of automotive parts wholesaler sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. Petitioner claimed academic record, ten years experience, license, and membership criteria. AAO found beneficiary met only one criterion, not the required three, so does not qualify for exceptional ability and NIW analysis not reached.

Supply chain manager with advanced degree sought NIW. AAO affirmed dismissal because endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; impact limited to employing company and clients, without demonstrated broader industry or field implications.

Treasurer/controller in construction industry sought EB-2 NIW for beneficiary proposing civil engineering and residential development company. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance; economic benefits limited to local region without sufficient prospective national impact or implications.

Occupational health and safety consultant sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO found proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance; evidence showed only general industry significance and vague vision statements without concrete training programs or detailed implementation. Petitioner not well positioned to advance endeavor. Appeal dismissed.

Petitioner with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW for project management consultancy using AI optimization. AAO dismissed appeal, finding substantial merit but not national importance. Petitioner conflated industry importance with endeavor-specific prospective impact and failed to demonstrate broader implications beyond her business.

Sales manager seeks national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. AAO withdrew service center decision and remanded for new decision because the original denial lacked sufficient analysis and explanation of how evidence failed to meet Dhanasar prongs; service center provided block quotations without explaining specific deficiencies.

Supply chain management researcher self-petitioned for EB-2 national interest waiver. Service center denied waiver despite advanced degree qualification. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, petitioner well positioned to advance it, and waiver benefits United States.

Entrepreneur seeks NIW for EB-2 classification to operate business consulting and professional development company. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite alignment with federal programs; focus on specific undertaking rather than general business importance is determinative.

Humanitarian nonprofit petitions for HR manager beneficiary for EB-2 with NIW. Beneficiary holds advanced degree and employer established EB-2 eligibility. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor lacked sufficient national importance to satisfy first Dhanasar prong.

Business analyst and trade consultant seeks EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for data analytics platform targeting maritime security and trade transparency. AAO affirmed that proposed endeavor lacks national importance and petitioner is not well positioned to advance it; insufficient evidence of economic or security impact.

Aging services manager with recent advanced degree seeks EB-2 NIW to advance elder care nationally. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to establish that proposed endeavor has national importance or that she is well-positioned to advance it; lacks innovation evidence, customer interest, or realized progress.

Supply chain consultant with advanced degree sought EB-2 classification and NIW. Petitioner claimed substantial merit and national importance of proposed supply chain consulting business. AAO agreed substantial merit established but found record did not demonstrate national importance; business impact limited to individual clients without broader economic or field-wide implications.

A business administrator sought EB-2 classification as advanced degree professional or person of exceptional ability, plus NIW. SCOPS denied both. The AAO remanded, finding SCOPS misrepresented the record, confused two separate petitions, and did not provide meaningful opportunity to contest. No opinion on ultimate merits.

Associate director in international supply chain operations seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. Service center found advanced degree qualification but denied waiver. AAO affirmed, holding that supply chain management work, despite general field importance, does not demonstrate specific national importance under Dhanasar first prong.

Human resources specialist seeks EB-2 NIW claiming innovative HR methodologies would benefit U.S. business landscape and job creation. AAO affirmed denial because while endeavor has substantial merit, petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance through specific prospective impact or connection to broader national implications.

Business management consultant with advanced degree seeks NIW. Petitioner claimed proposed management consulting services support federal priorities and address industry shortage. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks sufficient evidence of national importance, broader field implications, or substantial economic effects required under Dhanasar first prong.

A security consultant sought EB-2 national interest waiver to establish a security services business. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed business lacked national importance despite the field's merit, as its impact would not extend beyond specific clients to affect the security sector broadly.

A business continuity planner seeks EB-2 NIW based on exceptional ability and national interest. The AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit but lacks demonstrated national importance because support for Latino small businesses lacks sufficient prospective economic impact or field-wide implications, and the petitioner failed the first Dhanasar prong.

International legal advisor in business consulting seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner claimed endeavor had national importance through ecosystem strengthening and cross-border business benefits. AAO held first Dhanasar prong unmet: proposed endeavor lacks documented national importance; cited evidence addresses general field trends, not specific endeavor impact; insufficient proof of substantial economic benefits.

A management and financial analyst sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for a business venture. The AAO dismissed her second motion to reopen and reconsider because she submitted no new facts or evidence, and her contentions reasserted already-rejected arguments without establishing legal or policy error in prior decisions.

An entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with NIW. The AAO upheld dismissal because she failed to meet three of six exceptional ability criteria (no qualifying license, insufficient years of experience, insufficient salary, no professional membership). The NIW merits were not addressed.

A business administrator with advanced degree seeks EB-2 NIW classification. Petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance of proposed consulting endeavor. Work would benefit direct clients only without broader industry impact. Appeal dismissed under first Dhanasar prong.

Airline petitions for assistant director of operations and pilot as EB-2 exceptional ability with national interest waiver. AAO reversed service center's approval, finding beneficiary failed three of six evidentiary criteria, lacking relevant academic credentials, sufficient employment verification, and professional association membership.

A quality control manager sought EB-2 classification with NIW. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance and the petitioner was not well positioned to advance it. Hospitality experience did not support consulting business claims without demonstrated progress or contracts.