Published AAO appeal decisions

A mechanical engineer and project manager with an advanced degree proposed continuing infrastructure work in energy and oil-gas sectors. The AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance because his work would not extend beyond clients with broader implications, and he made impermissible material changes to his endeavor.

A controls engineer sought NIW for EB-2 under Dhanasar to advance Industry 4.0 manufacturing modernization. The AAO found him not well-positioned to advance the endeavor, lacking Ph.D. credentials, demonstrated influence in the field, and evidence of interest from relevant parties beyond his employer.

Mechanical engineer employed in advanced driver assistance systems sought national interest waiver. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked sufficient concrete examples of broad impact and petitioner did not establish ownership of intellectual property or impact beyond specific employer, failing the substantial merit and national importance prong.

Industrial machinery mechanic sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner met only two of six criteria and lacked exceptional ability: professional identity card did not constitute recognized profession license; salary evidence insufficient; professional association membership unsubstantiated; achievement recognition undemonstrated. Appeal dismissed.

Research engineer with mechanical engineering doctorate sought EB-2 NIW for HVAC&R systems research. AAO found the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to show he is well positioned to advance it without his current employment, lacking independent funding and demonstrating field adoption.

An industrial engineer with a doctorate in transportation engineering sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for predictive maintenance research. The AAO dismissed, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor despite meeting the first prong.

Materials engineer seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver for supply chain optimization initiative. Petitioner holds advanced degree but failed to establish national importance of proposed endeavor; claimed scalability and broad impacts lack specific details and independent corroborating evidence.

Senior engineering program manager with advanced degree seeks NIW for research on electromechanical systems including motor design, hybrid vehicle powertrains, and aerospace monitoring. SCOPS approved advanced degree qualification and substantial merit but denied national importance. AAO upheld dismissal, finding insufficient evidence of broader field impact or economic effects rising to national importance.

Industrial engineer seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver for modular oil and gas facility modernization work. Petitioner claimed national economic and environmental benefits. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked sufficient direct evidentiary tie to claimed benefits and national importance.

An industrial engineer sought EB-2 national interest waiver for manufacturing technology in recycled composites. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner established national importance of the endeavor but failed to demonstrate he was well-positioned to advance it, lacking documented record of success or demonstrated customer interest.

Mechanical engineer from Brazil proposing industrial maintenance services, consulting, and workforce training business seeking EB-2 NIW. AAO found petitioner lacked five years progressive experience for advanced degree professional basis. On merits, proposed endeavor lacks sufficient documentary evidence of national importance; workforce shortage alone insufficient; no showing of significant employment or regional economic benefit.

Aerospace engineer and robotics researcher sought EB-2 with national interest waiver to research autonomous decision-making algorithms. The AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to show he was well positioned to advance the research through publications with minimal citations and insufficient evidence of research impact.

Materials engineer self-petitioner sought NIW for EB-2 advanced degree. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner failed to establish national importance of proposed solar industry corrosion management solution; industry-wide statistics do not prove specific endeavor impact. Petitioner also not shown well positioned to advance endeavor.

An aerospace quality engineer sought NIW claiming his work on quality standards and mentoring would benefit the aviation industry. The AAO dismissed the appeal because he failed to establish that his specific proposed endeavor had national importance beyond typical occupational duties.

Research associate with master's in mechanical engineering sought EB-2 NIW to continue carbon capture and sustainable aviation fuel research. First prong met. AAO affirmed second prong failure: education strong but lacks Ph.D., plan insufficient, no documented role in obtaining funding; appeal dismissed.

An aircraft maintenance technician sought NIW for EB-2. The AAO found the proposed endeavor met the first Dhanasar prong on national importance but dismissed for failing the second prong. The petitioner lacked documented evidence of company existence, adequate funding, and a credible team to advance the proposed business.

A mechanical engineering researcher with an advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding she was not well-positioned to advance her proposed sustainable energy research endeavor, and declining to reach the first and third prongs.

Project engineer seeking EB-2 NIW for advanced simulation software development in mechanical engineering. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; impact on field insufficient and not extending beyond employer to justify waiver. Appeal dismissed.

An aerospace engineer with a Ph.D. seeking EB-2 with NIW for fatigue/damage tolerance research demonstrated the first Dhanasar prong but failed the second, lacking evidence his work influenced the field or represented record of success in advancing the endeavor.

Mechanical engineer researcher self-petitioner sought NIW under EB-2 for thermal battery development research. AAO affirmed first prong met but reversed on second prong, finding PhD degree and citations insufficient to demonstrate she is well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.

A mechanical engineer with a Ph.D. sought an NIW to pursue advanced manufacturing research for healthcare devices. The AAO found the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but concluded the petitioner did not demonstrate being well positioned to advance it, as education and publication citations alone do not show sufficient record of success.

Mechanical engineer with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for semiconductor manufacturing advancement. Service center denied without adequate explanation of Dhanasar prongs analysis. AAO remanded for new decision because service center failed to explain rationale and adequately address petitioner's proposed endeavor rather than employment position.

An advanced manufacturing engineer seeks EB-2 with NIW. The AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but found the petitioner did not adequately demonstrate national importance of the specific endeavor. The decision remanded for the director to reconsider the third prong using STEM-field guidance from policy manual.

A mechanical engineer and postdoctoral researcher sought NIW for research on catalysts for fuel cells and batteries. AAO found all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied: proposed research has national importance for U.S. competitiveness, petitioner is well positioned to advance it, and waiver benefits the United States.

An industrial engineer postdoctoral researcher sought EB-2 national interest waiver for supply chain research. The AAO reversed the Director on national importance, finding alignment with government priorities and field implications. However, the petitioner failed the second prong: insufficient evidence of personal record of success or influence establishing he could advance the endeavor.