Published AAO appeal decisions

Bioethicist with Ph.D. seeking NIW for university faculty and ethics consultation role. First prong met but second and third prongs failed because training was incomplete at filing, petitioner was not yet independent researcher, and lacked sufficient track record of successful research.

A software engineer sought EB-2 NIW for Internet of Things research. The AAO found the proposed endeavor met Dhanasar's first prong with national importance. However, the petitioner failed the second prong: academic credentials and published research were insufficient to demonstrate he was well positioned to advance the endeavor.

Urban planning researcher with PhD sought NIW for research in sustainable urban planning and environmental justice. AAO affirmed Director's denial: first prong met but second prong failed because petitioner lacked evidence of success, implementation, or influence in the field despite research experience and publications.

A postdoctoral fellow in chemical engineering sought EB-2 NIW based on proposed fuel research. The AAO found the endeavor had merit and national importance but dismissed because the petitioner lacked sufficient evidence of being well positioned to advance it, particularly given limited citation impact and no demonstrated primary funding responsibility.

An aerospace engineer sought national interest waiver. AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, but the petitioner failed the second prong because his research lacked demonstrated field impact, his role in funding was unclear, and his work showed no record of progress in advancing space research.

A petroleum engineer seeking NIW claimed ability to advance research on artificial lift technology. The AAO found the proposed endeavor met the first Dhanasar prong but dismissed the appeal because the engineer's publications, citations, education, and journal service did not demonstrate he was well positioned to advance the specific research.

Software developer with ten years experience seeks NIW for independent software development and possible game company. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed work lacks national importance beyond prospective employers and clients, and applicant lacks demonstrated success or concrete plan to advance the endeavor.

Gastroenterologist sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. Petitioner established substantial merit and national importance of proposed research endeavor but failed to demonstrate he was well positioned to advance it through sufficient record of success, impact, or progress. Appeal dismissed.

Industrial chemist seeking NIW for research on chemical applications. First prong met but second prong failed because patent and publications, though recognized, did not demonstrate sufficient industry impact or record of success needed to show petitioner well positioned to advance research endeavor.

A dentist trained in Brazil sought EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional with a national interest waiver. The AAO withdrew the finding that the foreign degree was equivalent to a US doctorate and found the petitioner not well positioned to advance the endeavor because he lacked US licensure and was working as a dental assistant. Worker shortage alone does not support a waiver.

Medical epidemiologist sought EB-2 advanced degree with NIW to advance public health preparedness and emergency response focusing on vaccine preventable diseases. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner met first Dhanasar prong but failed second prong; evidence submitted post-filing was inadmissible, and petitioner did not rebut director's finding of insufficient positioning.

Physician seeking NIW under EB-2 for proposed work as medical scientist conducting disease research. AAO held first prong met but second prong failed because petitioner is not well positioned to conduct medical research given background only in medical practice. Substantial material change between initial and revised proposed endeavors also demonstrated lack of positioning.

A wholesale agricultural products company sought national interest waiver for a beneficiary. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the beneficiary failed to meet exceptional ability requirements and did not establish well-positioning to advance the proposed endeavor or that waiver would benefit the United States.

A chemist with Ph.D. in organic chemistry sought national interest waiver. AAO found she met the first two Dhanasar prongs but failed the third, concluding waiver was not warranted because her fellowship was time-limited, her citation metrics were deficient, and publication benefits were contingent on academic versus commercial employment.

Metallurgist with advanced degree employed as research engineer sought national interest waiver of job offer requirement for EB-2 classification. AAO found proposed 3D printing research has substantial merit and national importance, and petitioner well positioned to advance it. However, petitioner failed to demonstrate that waiver would benefit United States on balance; dismissed.

Pharmaceutical scientist seeks national interest waiver of job offer requirement under EB-2. Met first prong showing substantial merit and national importance of proposed drug formulation research, but failed second prong lacking sufficient evidence of positioning to advance the work.

Business owner entrepreneur seeking national interest waiver to waive job offer requirement for EB-2 classification. Claimed endeavor in business administration had substantial merit and petitioner was well positioned to advance it, but proposed work lacked evidence of national importance, particularly regarding U.S. worker employment potential. Appeal dismissed.

A cardiologist and director seeking NIW under EB-2 claimed substantial merit and national importance for clinical work, teaching, and leadership. AAO found substantial merit but not national importance; clinical impact limited to individual workplace. Petitioner also failed to demonstrate being well positioned to advance endeavor.

Business manager with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for EB-2 claiming endeavor to improve U.S. business structures and profitability. AAO found he was well positioned to advance but proposed endeavor lacked sufficient national importance specificity, failing first Dhanasar prong and rendering waiver ineligible.

Senior research associate with advanced degree in medical data statistics sought NIW for EB-2. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed research had national importance but petitioner failed to demonstrate being well positioned to advance it despite citations and peer review work.

A biochemist and molecular biologist sought an NIW under EB-2. The AAO withdrew the Director's finding on the second prong and dismissed because she failed to demonstrate being well-positioned to advance her research endeavor. Education, citations, and peer review alone were insufficient without evidence of sustained funding or primary role in grant awards.

A medical scientist seeks NIW for research on diseases and therapeutic development. First Dhanasar prong met: research has substantial merit and national importance. Second prong failed: no evidence of financial support, entity interest, or positioning to advance the proposed endeavor in the United States.

A chemical engineer with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO found the proposed research had substantial merit and national importance but concluded the petitioner was not well positioned to advance it, dismissing the appeal.

A MEMS researcher sought NIW for advanced research in MEMS device design and fabrication. The AAO found his proposed work met the first Dhanasar prong but lacked sufficient evidence under the second prong that he is well positioned to advance the research independently.

Materials chemistry researcher pursuing Ph.D. seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Met first Dhanasar prong: proposed research in smart polymers has broader field implications. Failed second prong: insufficient evidence of being well positioned to advance the research despite publications, citations, and support letters. Appeal dismissed.