Published AAO appeal decisions

Mechanical engineer from Brazil proposing industrial maintenance services, consulting, and workforce training business seeking EB-2 NIW. AAO found petitioner lacked five years progressive experience for advanced degree professional basis. On merits, proposed endeavor lacks sufficient documentary evidence of national importance; workforce shortage alone insufficient; no showing of significant employment or regional economic benefit.

A software developer with advanced degree claims NIW for low-code platform development work. AAO affirmed SCOPS' denial, finding the endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance, as supporting letters conflate field importance with specific endeavor impact and job creation claims lack corroboration.

Semiconductor engineer with advanced degree in physics seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. Proposed developing semiconductor chips for telecommunications and computing. AAO found endeavor aligned with industry priorities but lacked demonstrated substantial national importance beyond incremental contributions. Appeal dismissed.

A data scientist with an advanced degree sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed the service center denial, finding the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance because the petitioner provided no evidence of prospective impact beyond the employer or significant economic effects.

Research and development manager in software engineering from China working on machine learning for insurance industry risk assessment. Met first Dhanasar prong on substantial merit and national importance but failed second prong; citations and education alone insufficient to demonstrate well-positioned status. Appeal dismissed.

A forecasting and data analysis researcher sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO dismissed, finding the first Dhanasar prong met but the second and third prongs unmet: insufficient evidence of being well-positioned to advance the endeavor and that a waiver would benefit the United States.

Postdoctoral researcher with advanced degrees seeks NIW for CAR T cell research involving epigenetic reprogramming. AAO found endeavor meets national importance but failed to demonstrate she is well positioned to advance it despite citations and peer review participation.

Chemical engineer self-petitioner sought NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification. AAO affirmed denial because petitioner failed to establish national importance of proposed endeavor due to vague, inconsistent description of multiple different jobs, and failed to show he was well positioned to advance any coherent endeavor without demonstrated government interest or fellowship offer.

An attorney with advanced degrees seeks NIW to develop AI legal technology. AAO dismissed appeal, holding that while industry importance aligns with government priorities, petitioner failed demonstrating specific proposed endeavor's prospective impact at national importance level required by Dhanasar.

A computer scientist with Ph.D. in STEM sought EB-2 national interest waiver for research endeavor. The AAO dismissed, finding he failed the second Dhanasar prong. Though his Ph.D. and publications were favorable factors, he lacked consistent independent research funding or demonstrated government interest to advance his proposed endeavor.

Occupational health professional appealed NIW denial under Dhanasar framework. AAO affirmed that while proposed endeavor had substantial merit, petitioner failed to establish its national importance. Consulting business lacked sufficiently specific prospective national impact and significant potential to employ U.S. workers or generate substantial economic effects. Appeal dismissed.

A Ph.D. student in informatics sought NIW for EB-2 classification with advanced degree. The AAO dismissed appeal after finding the proposed AI research endeavor lacks national importance. Field importance and STEM or critical emerging technology status alone do not establish specific endeavor's national importance.

Music therapist with advanced degree seeking national interest waiver for EB-2 employment-based petition. AAO found substantial merit in proposed music therapy services but denied waiver because endeavor lacked national importance, lacking broader field-wide impact beyond local clients.

Ph.D. student in molecular biology proposes cancer research on environmental, molecular, and genetic disease mechanisms. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but dismissed appeal because petitioner insufficient evidence of prior success or progress to show capacity to advance the proposed research.

Electrical and computer engineer with master's degree seeks NIW for research refining silicon carbide process integration for semiconductor devices. AAO held petitioner failed both Dhanasar prongs: endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance and petitioner was not well-positioned to advance it without employer resources or documented funding.

A civil engineer sought NIW for advanced-degree EB-2, proposing a scaffolding and shoring equipment business in Florida. The AAO dismissed the appeal, agreeing the endeavor had substantial merit but finding insufficient evidence that the specific endeavor would have national importance beyond local impact or economic significance.

Advanced degree professional in health policy sought national interest waiver for mental health initiative emphasizing health-in-all-policies approach. AAO affirmed denial, finding record lacked evidence of how the specific proposed endeavor would advance the field with national or global implications.

Formulation scientist with Ph.D. seeks NIW for drug delivery systems research. AAO found substantial merit and national importance of proposed research endeavor but concluded petitioner failed to demonstrate independence from employer, failing second prong.

Machine learning engineer with PhD in electrical and computer engineering seeks NIW for EB-2 employment-based classification. Proposed research in safe and fair AI algorithms for autonomous and recommendation systems. AAO found research had national importance but petitioner lacked demonstrated position, track record, and plan to advance the specific endeavor; appeal dismissed.

Humanitarian nonprofit petitions for HR manager beneficiary for EB-2 with NIW. Beneficiary holds advanced degree and employer established EB-2 eligibility. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor lacked sufficient national importance to satisfy first Dhanasar prong.

An optical imaging engineer self-petitioned for EB-2 NIW. The AAO affirmed that while the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, the petitioner failed to establish he was well-positioned to advance it due to insufficient evidence of future plans, funding, or investor interest.

An employer petitioned for an EB-2 national interest waiver for a machine learning engineer developing deep learning and NLP models. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate that the specific proposed endeavor had national importance despite evidence of AI field importance.

A psychologist sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for work involving mental health and diversity initiatives. The AAO dismissed because although the endeavor had substantial merit in health and education, it lacked demonstrated national importance; mere alignment with government initiatives and potential local benefit do not establish national impact.

Optical science engineer with Ph.D. in applied physics sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for research on quantum materials and superconductors. AAO found research meets first prong but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish being well-positioned to advance the endeavor as required by second prong.

Advanced degree professional sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner reargued facts and legal claims already considered on appeal and two prior motions without citing new precedent or showing incorrect application of law. Motion to reconsider dismissed; underlying petition remains denied.