Published AAO appeal decisions

Nutritionist seeking NIW with advanced degree. Petitioner materially changed proposed endeavor between filing and RFE response, shifting focus and field; inconsistent information prevented conclusion that she meets first or second Dhanasar prong.

An industrial designer specializing in exhibition booth design sought NIW classification for a proposed public market revitalization endeavor. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the endeavor lacked sufficient specificity and national importance, and the petitioner lacked a record of success in this new area despite design expertise.

Assistant professor of international studies sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Director approved first prong but denied second prong. AAO reversed, withdrawing national importance finding due to vague endeavor description and unclear future employment, and affirmed failure on second prong regarding positioning.

Finance executive in oil and gas industry seeking NIW under EB-2. Petitioner qualified for underlying EB-2 classification. AAO agreed her proposed work has substantial merit and she is well positioned to advance it, but found the endeavor lacks national importance: her financial management work would benefit only her employer, not the broader industry. Appeal dismissed.

Project execution supervisor sought national interest waiver for EB-2 advanced degree. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed work lacks national importance despite meeting prong two; improvements limited to employer's projects without broader industry impact or demonstrated U.S. economic effects.

A systems engineer sought EB-2 national interest waiver for advanced degree. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner satisfied the first Dhanasar prong regarding substantial merit and national importance but failed the second prong: insufficient evidence he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.

A mechanical and aerospace engineer with Ph.D. sought national interest waiver for EB-2. The AAO found his proposed research had substantial merit and national importance. However, he failed to demonstrate he was well positioned to advance the research because his education alone was insufficient and citation statistics and letters did not show personal research impact on the field.

A post-doctoral research associate in entomology sought NIW for EB-2 classification. The AAO held the proposed endeavor lacks sufficient specificity and documented broader impact; prior publication citations and speaking engagements do not establish that future teaching, mentoring, and research would impact the field nationally rather than only serve local students and institutions.

Acupotomy researcher and clinician seeking NIW under EB-2 for proposed clinical work. Qualifies as individual of exceptional ability. AAO held endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance because impact is limited to specific patients and locations without demonstrated broader implications for healthcare field or quality of life broadly.

Structural engineer seeking NIW as assistant professor and researcher. Proposed endeavor materially changed after filing from researcher role to professor-researcher hybrid; national importance not established; petitioner failed to address director's conclusions on appeal.

Project engineer sought NIW for EB-2. Service Center approved advanced degree but denied NIW. AAO dismissed because proposed roadway safety endeavor lacked sufficient detail and national importance; no direct connection established between specific endeavor and broader implications.

Bioethicist with Ph.D. seeking NIW for university faculty and ethics consultation role. First prong met but second and third prongs failed because training was incomplete at filing, petitioner was not yet independent researcher, and lacked sufficient track record of successful research.

A software engineer sought EB-2 NIW for Internet of Things research. The AAO found the proposed endeavor met Dhanasar's first prong with national importance. However, the petitioner failed the second prong: academic credentials and published research were insufficient to demonstrate he was well positioned to advance the endeavor.

Urban planning researcher with PhD sought NIW for research in sustainable urban planning and environmental justice. AAO affirmed Director's denial: first prong met but second prong failed because petitioner lacked evidence of success, implementation, or influence in the field despite research experience and publications.

A postdoctoral fellow in chemical engineering sought EB-2 NIW based on proposed fuel research. The AAO found the endeavor had merit and national importance but dismissed because the petitioner lacked sufficient evidence of being well positioned to advance it, particularly given limited citation impact and no demonstrated primary funding responsibility.

An aerospace engineer sought national interest waiver. AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, but the petitioner failed the second prong because his research lacked demonstrated field impact, his role in funding was unclear, and his work showed no record of progress in advancing space research.

A petroleum engineer seeking NIW claimed ability to advance research on artificial lift technology. The AAO found the proposed endeavor met the first Dhanasar prong but dismissed the appeal because the engineer's publications, citations, education, and journal service did not demonstrate he was well positioned to advance the specific research.

Software developer with ten years experience seeks NIW for independent software development and possible game company. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed work lacks national importance beyond prospective employers and clients, and applicant lacks demonstrated success or concrete plan to advance the endeavor.

Gastroenterologist sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. Petitioner established substantial merit and national importance of proposed research endeavor but failed to demonstrate he was well positioned to advance it through sufficient record of success, impact, or progress. Appeal dismissed.

Industrial chemist seeking NIW for research on chemical applications. First prong met but second prong failed because patent and publications, though recognized, did not demonstrate sufficient industry impact or record of success needed to show petitioner well positioned to advance research endeavor.

A dentist trained in Brazil sought EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional with a national interest waiver. The AAO withdrew the finding that the foreign degree was equivalent to a US doctorate and found the petitioner not well positioned to advance the endeavor because he lacked US licensure and was working as a dental assistant. Worker shortage alone does not support a waiver.

Medical epidemiologist sought EB-2 advanced degree with NIW to advance public health preparedness and emergency response focusing on vaccine preventable diseases. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner met first Dhanasar prong but failed second prong; evidence submitted post-filing was inadmissible, and petitioner did not rebut director's finding of insufficient positioning.

Physician seeking NIW under EB-2 for proposed work as medical scientist conducting disease research. AAO held first prong met but second prong failed because petitioner is not well positioned to conduct medical research given background only in medical practice. Substantial material change between initial and revised proposed endeavors also demonstrated lack of positioning.

A wholesale agricultural products company sought national interest waiver for a beneficiary. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the beneficiary failed to meet exceptional ability requirements and did not establish well-positioning to advance the proposed endeavor or that waiver would benefit the United States.

A chemist with Ph.D. in organic chemistry sought national interest waiver. AAO found she met the first two Dhanasar prongs but failed the third, concluding waiver was not warranted because her fellowship was time-limited, her citation metrics were deficient, and publication benefits were contingent on academic versus commercial employment.