Published AAO appeal decisions

A researcher with a doctoral degree sought a national interest waiver for an EB-2 petition proposing work on substance use disorder treatment. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of her proposed endeavor despite working in an important field, lacking specific independent evidence comparable to expert letters required.

A postdoctoral researcher in plant genetics sought EB-2 NIW classification through self-petition. The applicant demonstrated all three Dhanasar prongs: the research on plant resistance has national importance, the researcher has proven expertise and track record, and the U.S. benefits from the advanced STEM work. The appeal was sustained.

Engineer and researcher in clinical tissue engineering and transplantation seeking EB-2 advanced degree classification and national interest waiver. AAO affirmed that petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate being well-positioned to advance proposed endeavor; education and publications insufficient without demonstrated record of success.

Employer sponsored beneficiary for EB-2 national interest waiver in product analytics using AI and machine learning. AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance claim, holding that working in STEM or shortage occupations alone insufficient without broader prospective impacts to national economy.

An educator sought EB-2 national interest waiver for her proposed endeavor in education. The AAO dismissed her fifth motion to reopen, finding no new facts warranting reconsideration of the prior denial that her specific educational endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance despite general field importance.

Finance executive with advanced degree sought national interest waiver as EB-2. Petitioner claimed substantial merit and national importance for proposed finance role. AAO dismissed motion, finding petitioner reargued prior issues without new evidence or legal error and did not meet first prong.

Physical therapist filed second motion to reconsider denied NIW petition. Petitioner reargued eligibility without demonstrating misapplication of law or policy. AAO confirmed prior dismissal, holding that field importance and worker shortage do not establish endeavor's national importance. Motion dismissed.

Lead data engineer: employer-sponsored EB-2 with national interest waiver claim. Petitioner asserted cloud computing and AI work had national importance. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked national or global implications and benefited only specific employer; first prong failed.

A dentist sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO confirmed EB-2 eligibility but dismissed the appeal under Dhanasar framework, finding the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance. Services to individual patients and general professional shortage do not constitute nationally significant impact.

Military chaplain with advanced degree sought NIW for proposed endeavor addressing servicemember suicide and extremism. AAO affirmed dismissal because the endeavor lacks national importance; impact confined to individuals receiving services, not the broader field or national interest.

An advanced manufacturing engineer seeks EB-2 with NIW. The AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but found the petitioner did not adequately demonstrate national importance of the specific endeavor. The decision remanded for the director to reconsider the third prong using STEM-field guidance from policy manual.

Clinical research scientist in neurology sought EB-2 NIW for COVID-19 related research. SCOPS found substantial merit but not national importance; AAO affirmed. Petitioner failed to show how her specific proposed endeavor would have broader implications or significant prospective impact distinct from general field importance.

Nautical operations specialist seeks NIW for maritime training academy. AAO held the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; petitioner failed to demonstrate prospective impact, sustainable business model, or how his academy would address claimed personnel shortage on a national scale.

A postdoctoral researcher self-petitioned for NIW seeking EB-2 as individual with advanced degree. She proposed researching immunological reactions to kidney transplantation. The AAO found the endeavor had national importance but dismissed because prior publications in unrelated medical fields did not establish she was well positioned to advance this specific research area.

A pharmaceutical researcher with advanced degree seeking EB-2 classification and national interest waiver for nanotechnology drug delivery research targeting cancer and HIV. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: endeavor advances federal priorities, petitioner well-positioned through expertise and proven success, and waiver benefits U.S. public health.

Civil engineer with doctoral research on sustainable construction materials claimed an NIW. AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, and the petitioner was well-positioned to advance it, but rejected the waiver because evidence did not establish the national interest was sufficiently urgent to bypass labor certification.

A mechanical engineer and postdoctoral researcher sought NIW for research on catalysts for fuel cells and batteries. AAO found all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied: proposed research has national importance for U.S. competitiveness, petitioner is well positioned to advance it, and waiver benefits the United States.

Physician with cardio-oncology research proposed advancing treatment of cardiovascular diseases in cancer patients. AAO found research met national importance but his published work lacked evidence of driving field progress or generating relevant party interest, failing the well-positioned prong.

Hospitalist physician with medical degree and research expertise in vascular diseases sought NIW for clinical research on peripheral arterial disease. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, petitioner well positioned to advance it, and waiver beneficial to United States.

Neuroscience researcher with Ph.D. seeks EB-2 self-petition with NIW for research on Alzheimer's and ataxia mechanisms using stem cells. AAO found all three Dhanasar prongs met: research has national importance with broader implications, petitioner well-positioned with advanced degree and track record, and waiver benefits U.S. given urgent medical need.

A microbiologist with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver for genetic research on foodborne pathogens and antimicrobial resistance. The AAO affirmed he met the first two Dhanasar prongs but dismissed because he failed to establish the national interest in his contributions was urgent enough to justify waiving labor certification requirements.

Research professor proposed STEM research endeavor and sought national interest waiver as self-petitioner. AAO found endeavor has national importance and beneficiary well positioned, but dismissed appeal because urgency of national interest insufficient to justify waiving labor certification requirement.

IT professional with advanced degree sought NIW under EB-2 for STEM research. AAO found first two Dhanasar prongs met but dismissed because petitioner demonstrated ability to secure employment and failed to establish that national interest was urgent enough to waive labor certification requirement.

Computer science researcher sought EB-2 NIW. Petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional and proposed AI and mental health research. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner not well-positioned under Dhanasar prong two; publication and citation rates unexceptional relative to field, and insufficient evidence of progress or sustained interest in proposed endeavor.

A computer vision engineer with Master's in electrical and computer engineering sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. AAO found proposed AI research had substantial merit and national importance but concluded petitioner lacked sufficient record of success, detailed plan, or financial means to advance the endeavor.