Published AAO appeal decisions

A hairstylist sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed the appeal because petitioner failed to meet the underlying EB-2 exceptional ability requirements, satisfying only two of six regulatory criteria. National interest waiver analysis was not reached.

A contemporary dancer met at least three EB-1A evidentiary criteria but failed the final merits determination. The decision found insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim, noting a prolonged absence from performing, a shift to other fields, and no evidence of ongoing recognition. Appeal dismissed.

Architect seeks national interest waiver for sustainable architecture consulting business. AAO held the endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but applicant lacks demonstrated success or progress in advancing this specific endeavor, so waiver denied.

A graphical design entrepreneur sought exceptional ability classification and NIW. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to contest the director's adverse final merits determination on appeal, constituting waiver of a dispositive issue that made overall eligibility impossible.

Interior design firm petitioned for founder/principal designer claiming EB-1A extraordinary ability. Met no initial three criteria: awards, judging, original contributions, and salary all failed. Prior O-1B approvals did not override stricter immigrant standards. Final merits analysis found insufficient acclaim for top percentage status.

Interior design business petitioned for senior interior designer O-1A nonimmigrant classification. AAO affirmed dismissal finding beneficiary met only published materials and recognition criteria; did not satisfy three-criterion threshold; petitioner also lacked valid U.S. employer status.

An artist with exceptional ability sought EB-2 with NIW for environmental and wildlife art using recycled materials. The AAO affirmed denial, finding her specific proposed endeavor lacked national importance despite artistic merit. Letters addressed the field generally without explaining her particular work's broader implications.

An architect qualified as advanced degree professional seeks NIW for EB-2 proposing sustainable design and architecture work with training offerings. AAO found petitioner failed to establish national importance of specific proposed endeavor under Dhanasar first prong; general importance of sustainable architecture field insufficient, dismissing appeal.

Art teacher with seventeen years experience sought EB-2 classification as advanced degree professional or individual of exceptional ability, plus national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish eligibility for underlying EB-2 classification; waiver analysis was reserved and not decided.

A watercolor artist seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO remanded because the Director's denial lacked complete analysis and sufficient explanation for rejecting several criteria claimed by the petitioner; Director must re-examine evidence and provide detailed reasoning.

Architect sought NIW for EB-2 classification. AAO dismissed the appeal due to invalid electronic signatures on appeal forms (I-290B and G-28) not meeting regulatory requirements for original signatures. Additionally, petitioner failed to contest Director's adverse finding on the dispositive second prong of Dhanasar analysis.

Materials engineer entrepreneur seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver for interior design business claimed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance. AAO affirmed denial, finding no evidence of broader industry implications or substantial economic effects; projected eight hires insufficient.

Advanced-degree holder sought waiver to open filmmaking and videomaking consultancy employing seven workers. Qualified for underlying EB-2 but failed to show national importance; proposed endeavor lacks significant potential for U.S. employment or economic effects.

A talent agency petitioned for O-1A classification of a photographer claiming extraordinary ability. The applicant failed to meet the evidentiary criteria: published material lacked proper documentation and major publication status, and critical recognition letters came from non-photography experts. The appeal was dismissed.

Fashion designer seeks EB-2 advanced degree professional with national interest waiver for sustainable bespoke design practice. AAO found petitioner qualified for underlying EB-2 classification but failed first Dhanasar prong: proposed production model not sufficiently innovative. Appeal dismissed.

Restaurant petitioned for O-1A classification of executive chef claiming extraordinary ability in the culinary arts. AAO dismissed appeal because beneficiary failed to establish any of the required evidentiary criteria, with evidence containing credibility and consistency issues.

An architect and project manager with advanced degree sought NIW. AAO found substantial merit but not national importance; initial proposed endeavor lacked broader implications beyond self-owned firm and petitioner impermissibly changed the proposed endeavor post-filing.

A violin restorer claimed extraordinary ability based on awards, membership, and published material. AAO dismissed, finding awards lacked national recognition, membership criterion not satisfied, published material insufficient, and no three-criterion threshold met for final merits consideration.

Music director seeks NIW under EB-2 advanced degree or exceptional ability classification. AAO affirmed denial: endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; revenue and employment projections insufficient to demonstrate substantial positive economic effects at national or regional level.

A permanent makeup artist, trainer, and salon owner proposed operating an aesthetic beauty salon and training center, claiming exceptional ability and national interest waiver eligibility. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the endeavor lacked national importance; claimed free cancer patient services represented a material post-filing change and prior experience primarily addressed a different Dhanasar prong.

Tattoo artist sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. Met exceptional ability but failed to demonstrate endeavor has national importance. AAO affirmed denial because tattoo business lacks significant impact on broader field or substantial economic effects beyond direct clients.

An artist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner met only one of ten evidentiary criteria and failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for the final merits determination.

Executive sous chef in O-1 visa status sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner met none of three analyzed criteria: published material lacked evidence of being about him, high salary fell below top earners, and evidence insufficient for leading or critical role finding.

An entrepreneur in film and video production claimed exceptional ability status and national interest waiver. The AAO found he met only one of six evidentiary criteria, reversing the Service Center's finding on professional membership and rejecting recognition for achievements. The appeal was dismissed.