AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
925 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementOct 2025Dismissed
A management scientist sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver for research-based endeavors in inclusive leadership and workforce adaptability. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial merit and national importance of the specific proposed endeavor under Dhanasar's first prong.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementOct 2025Dismissed
An entrepreneur with advanced degree claims NIW for supply chain logistics consultancy. AAO reversed service center's EB-2 denial on advanced degree grounds but affirmed NIW denial, finding specific endeavor lacks national importance; work for prospective clients lacks regional or national impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementOct 2025Dismissed
A consultant sought an NIW to operate a consultancy company for small and medium-sized enterprises. Although the AAO found substantial merit and the petitioner well positioned, the endeavor lacked national importance; consulting services for regional businesses did not demonstrate prospective impact of national significance.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementOct 2025Dismissed
An industrial engineer sought NIW for proposed consulting work. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance, showing only general field importance and speculative potential benefits rather than specific prospective impact of her proposed endeavor.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementOct 2025Dismissed
Entrepreneur seeking EB-2 NIW for business exporting supply chain products. AAO dismissed appeal, finding substantial merit but not national importance. Petitioner failed to demonstrate specific prospective impact beyond her company and customers; reliance on sector importance and general statistics insufficient without corroborating evidence of substantial economic effects.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementOct 2025Dismissed
Project management specialist with advanced degree sought NIW for a consulting initiative providing training and mentorship to rural entrepreneurs in Florida. AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor, while having substantial merit, lacks the national importance required by the first prong of the Dhanasar framework; general economic benefits and job creation potential are insufficient.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementOct 2025Dismissed
General manager seeking EB-2 NIW for business consulting services claimed company importance to U.S. business ecosystem. AAO dismissed, finding no sufficient evidence that proposed endeavor would impact business consulting field broadly or generate substantial positive economic effects at national level.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementSep 2025Dismissed
HR professional and entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW based on proposed AI platform connecting businesses with artisans and sustainable fashion work. AAO found endeavor lacked sufficient national importance; broad statements about economic benefits and job creation were unsubstantiated by corroborating evidence of prospective impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementSep 2025Dismissed
Business consultant and CEO from Russia sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The petitioner met two criteria: lesser awards and judging. The AAO rejected original contributions as merely disseminating others' work and found articles non-scholarly. Because the petitioner met only two of ten required evidentiary criteria, the AAO dismissed the appeal without reaching final merits.
2 of 11 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementSep 2025Dismissed
A management and operations specialist with engineering background sought EB-1A classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to meet three of the ten required evidentiary criteria, and withdrew SCOPS findings on judging and high salary as unsupported.
2 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementSep 2025Dismissed
HR consultant sought EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner demonstrated substantial merit of proposed US HR consulting endeavor but failed to establish national importance, concluding prospective impact limited to particular business rather than field or broader economy. Appeal dismissed without addressing positioning or balance arguments.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementSep 2025Dismissed
A marketing director for a luxury resort wear company sought extraordinary ability classification through employer petition. Claimant submitted five criteria but failed three regarding awards, publications, and critical role. AAO declined final merits review after finding insufficient initial evidence threshold satisfaction.
0 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementSep 2025Dismissed
A security consultant sought EB-2 national interest waiver to establish a security services business. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed business lacked national importance despite the field's merit, as its impact would not extend beyond specific clients to affect the security sector broadly.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementSep 2025Dismissed
Financial technologist and CEO of self-owned fintech firm from Dominican Republic seeking EB-1A classification. Claimed five criteria; the AAO found membership and high salary unmet and deemed published material and scholarly articles waived. Without three criteria met, the AAO dismissed the appeal without reaching overall extraordinary ability.
0 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementSep 2025Dismissed
International trade specialist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner claimed six criteria and service center found two met. On appeal, petitioner contended three additional criteria were satisfied. AAO affirmed service center's findings, concluding petitioner met only two criteria (judging and scholarly articles), below the three-criterion threshold, and dismissed the appeal without reaching final merits.
2 of 11 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementSep 2025Dismissed
A business development coach from Colombia claimed extraordinary ability in social innovation and sustainable business. The AAO found he met only two of ten evidentiary criteria and did not satisfy the threshold requirement of three criteria, so dismissed without reaching the final sustained acclaim analysis.
2 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementSep 2025Dismissed
A business continuity planner seeks EB-2 NIW based on exceptional ability and national interest. The AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit but lacks demonstrated national importance because support for Latino small businesses lacks sufficient prospective economic impact or field-wide implications, and the petitioner failed the first Dhanasar prong.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementSep 2025Dismissed
A travel and tourism company executive sought extraordinary ability classification, but this decision is an EB-1A matter rather than a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the evidence did not meet at least three evidentiary criteria, and it reserved the remaining prospective-benefit issue.
Read → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementAug 2025Dismissed
Business management consultant with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar first prong. Business plan projections and service to minority-owned small businesses insufficient to demonstrate broader economic or sectoral impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementAug 2025Dismissed
Self-petitioner in digital education transformation business seeks EB-1A classification. Three initial criteria met but appeal dismissed because record shows limited, recent instances without sustained national or international acclaim or evidence of top-tier recognition in the field.
3 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementAug 2025Dismissed
Dismissed · 5 criteria reviewed0 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementJul 2025Dismissed
An IT consultant sought EB-2 with national interest waiver to establish a consultancy serving the pharmaceutical industry. The AAO affirmed dismissal because his business plan, though showing substantial merit, lacked sufficient evidence that the methodology had been adopted in industry or would significantly benefit the national economy.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementJun 2025Dismissed
International legal advisor in business consulting seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner claimed endeavor had national importance through ecosystem strengthening and cross-border business benefits. AAO held first Dhanasar prong unmet: proposed endeavor lacks documented national importance; cited evidence addresses general field trends, not specific endeavor impact; insufficient proof of substantial economic benefits.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementJun 2025Dismissed
Regional logistics manager employed by yard management services provider sought national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial, finding broad claims about strategic leadership and industry impact insufficient; specific endeavor showed no prospective national economic benefit or U.S. job creation.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementJun 2025Dismissed
Business management professional self-petitioner seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met three initial criteria but AAO found no sustained national or international acclaim, with internal awards only from 2007-2009, failing final merits determination.
3 of 11 criteria metRead →
