Published AAO appeal decisions

Treasurer/controller in construction industry sought EB-2 NIW for beneficiary proposing civil engineering and residential development company. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance; economic benefits limited to local region without sufficient prospective national impact or implications.

Business development executive and entrepreneur in technology-driven fitness and wellness ventures claims extraordinary ability. Petitioner claimed five criteria; Service Center found two met. AAO found three criteria met on de novo review, satisfying initial evidence requirement. Decision remanded for final merits determination on sustained acclaim and top-tier status.

Manufacturing optimization consultant with Brazilian bachelor's degree in industrial engineering claiming five years progressive experience equivalent to master's degree. SCOPS denied without adequately addressing employment letters. AAO remanded for proper analysis of whether petitioner established advanced degree equivalent and, if so, NIW merits.

A business manager filed for EB-2 exceptional ability with national interest waiver. She satisfied three evidentiary criteria initially but failed final merits determination, lacking expertise significantly above ordinary in the field. AAO found no exceptional ability and thus ineligible for EB-2 or NIW, dismissing appeal.

Business executive with advanced degree sought NIW for technology-focused business endeavor. AAO affirmed dismissal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance because business plan was vague on location and operations, lacked substantiated financial projections, and provided only generalized industry information rather than specific endeavor impact.

A management analyst appealed his EB-1A denial. He met only one criterion: judging. The AAO found he did not establish membership in qualifying associations, high comparative salary, or a leading role in distinguished organizations. Because he failed to meet the required three criteria at the initial evidence stage, the petition was dismissed without reaching the final merits analysis.

Occupational health and safety consultant sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO found proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance; evidence showed only general industry significance and vague vision statements without concrete training programs or detailed implementation. Petitioner not well positioned to advance endeavor. Appeal dismissed.

An accounting and tax consultant filed a second motion to reopen and reconsider her denied EB-1A petition. The AAO dismissed the motion to reopen for failing to state new facts with documentary evidence and dismissed the motion to reconsider because the petitioner met only one of the required alternative criteria and was not entitled to a final merits determination.

A business executive sought O-1A classification through a technology company petitioner. On appeal the petitioner claimed three of eight criteria: published material, original contributions and critical capacity. The AAO dismissed the appeal because none was established, so the initial evidentiary requirement failed and the final merits were reserved.

An event planner and entrepreneur sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability with a national interest waiver. The service center denied for failing the EB-2 threshold. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner did not specifically challenge the exceptional ability findings, so the Dhanasar prongs were never evaluated.

Petitioner with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW for project management consultancy using AI optimization. AAO dismissed appeal, finding substantial merit but not national importance. Petitioner conflated industry importance with endeavor-specific prospective impact and failed to demonstrate broader implications beyond her business.

Economist and former Armenian politician petitioned for EB-1A claiming eight criteria. AAO found three criteria met: published material, scholarly articles, and leading role at organizations. Case remanded for final merits analysis on whether evidence shows sustained acclaim among top percentile in field.

Consultant with advanced degree proposing consulting and auditing services for small and medium businesses in financial compliance and governance. AAO held working in important industry insufficient; specific endeavor lacks demonstrated broader implications for field or economy.

Sales manager seeks national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. AAO withdrew service center decision and remanded for new decision because the original denial lacked sufficient analysis and explanation of how evidence failed to meet Dhanasar prongs; service center provided block quotations without explaining specific deficiencies.

A supply and trade professional sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for maritime logistics work. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding his proposed endeavor lacked sufficient specificity regarding actual activities and failed to demonstrate national importance or broader implications beyond generalized objectives.

An employer petitioned on behalf of a top executive for extraordinary ability classification. The AAO withdrew the service center's previous findings on two criteria: membership and high salary. With fewer than three criteria met, the threshold initial evidence requirement failed. The AAO declined to reach final merits. Appeal dismissed.

A business executive claimed extraordinary ability through seven regulatory criteria, including awards and scholarly articles. The AAO found he did not receive a major internationally recognized award and met fewer than three alternate criteria. The appeal was dismissed because initial evidentiary requirements were not satisfied.

University-sponsored global engagement coordinator claiming extraordinary ability. Petitioner established two of eight alternate criteria: judging and scholarly articles. Failed to demonstrate three required criteria under published material and original contributions standards. Decision not reached on final merits assessment.

General manager and founder working in advanced materials research and development. Claimed seven criteria; met four initial evidentiary requirements. AAO affirmed denial because totality of evidence did not establish career of acclaimed work or small percentage at very top of field despite meeting minimum threshold.

Petitioner with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW for affordable housing company addressing federal housing priorities. AAO dismissed appeal, finding substantial merit but not national importance. Petitioner failed to demonstrate how her specific endeavor would produce broader implications extending beyond her company and clients to impact the field or economy.

Investment fund director with eleven years in private equity and banking claimed five criteria plus comparable evidence. AAO found published material and comparable evidence (display) criteria met, satisfying the three-criterion threshold. However, on final merits, petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained acclaim or position among the small percentage at the very top of his field, so appeal was dismissed.

Supply chain management researcher self-petitioned for EB-2 national interest waiver. Service center denied waiver despite advanced degree qualification. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, petitioner well positioned to advance it, and waiver benefits United States.

A management analyst with advanced degree claims NIW for small business closure reduction consultancy in underserved areas. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; evidence on field importance does not demonstrate specific endeavor's broader implications.

Chief executive seeks extraordinary ability classification. Claimed judging, awards, and leading role criteria. AAO found awards not for field excellence, judging lacked corroboration, and critical role unestablished. Fewer than three criteria met; appeal dismissed.