Published AAO appeal decisions

A software engineer and systems researcher sought an NIW for autonomous vehicle research. The AAO found substantial merit in the proposed endeavor but dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate he was well positioned to advance it, lacking evidence of progress or external support.

A computer scientist with master's degree sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for research in network architecture for data centers. The AAO dismissed, finding the petitioner established substantial merit but failed to prove national importance of the specific proposed endeavor despite industry relevance.

Computer engineer with master's degree seeks NIW for research in advanced computational models, brain-machine interfaces, and smart sensors. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks demonstrated national importance or evidence of impact on healthcare, neurotechnology, agriculture, or public health fields.

Information security associate vice president claimed seven criteria and satisfied three: judging, leading role, and high salary. AAO held initial evidence requirements met but final merits analysis showed insufficient evidence of sustained acclaim or placement among small percentage at top of field.

Semiconductor engineer with advanced degree in physics seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. Proposed developing semiconductor chips for telecommunications and computing. AAO found endeavor aligned with industry priorities but lacked demonstrated substantial national importance beyond incremental contributions. Appeal dismissed.

Research and development manager in software engineering from China working on machine learning for insurance industry risk assessment. Met first Dhanasar prong on substantial merit and national importance but failed second prong; citations and education alone insufficient to demonstrate well-positioned status. Appeal dismissed.

Infrastructure specialist proposed IT consulting firm offering system design, project management, and cybersecurity services. Sought EB-2 NIW but petitioner failed to establish specific endeavor had national importance beyond potential client benefit. AAO dismissed, finding insufficient prospective impact on IT field or economy.

Information security analyst IV with PhD sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found beneficiary satisfied judging and authorship criteria but withdrew service center findings on leading role and high salary; did not meet threshold of three criteria; final merits determination not reached.

A senior IT consultant working with AI-driven frameworks sought EB-1A classification. The service center found at least three evidentiary criteria satisfied but denied on final merits. The AAO did not decide additional criteria and dismissed the appeal, finding the evidence did not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.

An IT specialist and entrepreneur sought NIW for enterprise architecture and SAP transformation advisory services. AAO dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate national importance of the specific proposed endeavor; lack of evidence corroborating job creation projections and economic impact claims.

A computer scientist with Ph.D. in STEM sought EB-2 national interest waiver for research endeavor. The AAO dismissed, finding he failed the second Dhanasar prong. Though his Ph.D. and publications were favorable factors, he lacked consistent independent research funding or demonstrated government interest to advance his proposed endeavor.

A computer information systems professional proposed modernization services to small and medium enterprises. The AAO held the endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar; services to direct clients alone do not establish broader field impact or global implications needed for national importance. Appeal dismissed.

A Ph.D. student in informatics sought NIW for EB-2 classification with advanced degree. The AAO dismissed appeal after finding the proposed AI research endeavor lacks national importance. Field importance and STEM or critical emerging technology status alone do not establish specific endeavor's national importance.

A computer science researcher with a PhD seeks EB-2 with NIW based on AI and STEM education research. SCOPS found she qualified for underlying EB-2 but denied NIW. The AAO affirmed because her proposed endeavor lacked sufficient specificity and corroborating evidence to establish national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.

Machine learning software engineer employed by a company seeks national interest waiver. Claimed his proposed AI research has substantial merit and national importance. AAO held the evidence does not demonstrate prospective national or global impact on the field; references to AI importance and conference invitations do not establish national importance of his specific endeavor.

Machine learning engineer with PhD in electrical and computer engineering seeks NIW for EB-2 employment-based classification. Proposed research in safe and fair AI algorithms for autonomous and recommendation systems. AAO found research had national importance but petitioner lacked demonstrated position, track record, and plan to advance the specific endeavor; appeal dismissed.

A digital product technical consultant with an advanced degree proposed developing an interoperable health data platform for chronic disease management. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding her endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; recommendation letters and projections lack sufficient documentary evidence of broader impact beyond her employer and clients.

An optical imaging engineer self-petitioned for EB-2 NIW. The AAO affirmed that while the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, the petitioner failed to establish he was well-positioned to advance it due to insufficient evidence of future plans, funding, or investor interest.

An employer petitioned for an EB-2 national interest waiver for a machine learning engineer developing deep learning and NLP models. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate that the specific proposed endeavor had national importance despite evidence of AI field importance.

Information security specialist with master's degree sought NIW for cybersecurity consulting startup. Appeal dismissed because petitioner failed to establish national importance of proposed endeavor beyond personal employment and failed to demonstrate being well positioned to advance it.

A business executive in educational technology sought NIW classification. The AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar despite substantial merit. The unreliable business plan failed to demonstrate broader implications, significant employment potential, or positive economic effects required.

A senior SoC researcher sought EB-2 NIW under Dhanasar. The AAO found substantial merit and national importance of his hardware security research but held he failed to show he is well-positioned to advance it, lacking contemporaneous evidence of impact or specific advancement plan.

An entrepreneur in STEM education proposed to establish a coding academy for underrepresented groups. The AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance as a specific undertaking, and dismissed the appeal without addressing remaining Dhanasar prongs.

Senior machine learning engineer proposes research on foundational model disentanglement and interpretability. AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but rejected the petition because the petitioner failed to demonstrate she is well-positioned to advance it through sufficient record of success or influence in the field.