Published AAO appeal decisions

A telecommunications researcher with doctorate proposed advancing machine learning and deep learning research under EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO found her endeavor met national importance but dismissed appeal because publications, nominal peer reliance, and limited demonstrated funding responsibility failed to show she was well positioned to advance it.

AI researcher and CEO sought EB-1A classification claiming four criteria; two were met. Motion to reconsider challenged findings on original contributions and high salary. AAO upheld prior dismissal, finding motion did not establish error in law or policy application.

Chief Technology Officer seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability in science, technology, and education claimed seven criteria. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to meet three required criteria: awards not related to proposed endeavor, published material insufficient, and original contributions not of major significance.

An entrepreneur and computer systems engineer sought NIW classification to operate an IT services company. The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the venture's national importance or that a waiver would benefit the United States, and also lacked advanced degree credentials as initially claimed.

An information security analyst in IT and cybersecurity sought EB-1A classification. She claimed four criteria across proceedings. The AAO found membership and salary criteria unmet and reserved analysis of two others. Aggregate review showed no sustained national or international acclaim or evidence of top-tier recognition in the field.

Computer scientist petitions for EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Established two of ten initial criteria: published material and judging. AAO held original contributions lack demonstrated major significance and salary evidence lacks adequate comparative context. Failed to meet threshold of three criteria.

A cybersecurity engineer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding he did not satisfy at least three of ten evidentiary criteria and lacked the sustained national or international acclaim required for final merits determination.

CEO and software engineer claims extraordinary ability in sciences under EB-1A. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner met zero of seven evidentiary criteria claimed, lacking nationally recognized awards, relevant professional memberships, major contributions to field, scholarly publications, or high salary evidence.

Search engine optimizer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner claimed five criteria, with service center finding only two met. On appeal, petitioner pursued scholarly articles claim based on published book, which AAO rejected as not constituting scholarly articles. Unable to meet three-criterion minimum, appeal dismissed without final merits analysis.

Research scientist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for developing artificial intelligence technologies. Decision found proposed endeavor lacks sufficient detail and evidence to establish prospective national importance. Appeal dismissed on first prong failure.

AI researcher seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver claimed substantial merit, national importance, positioning to advance, and balance favoring waiver under Dhanasar. AAO found first prong met but rejected second and third prongs: petitioner lacks completed degree, secured funding, or concrete employment plans; waiver not shown beneficial to United States.

A cybersecurity specialist seeks NIW as an EB-2 advanced degree professional. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner did not possess an advanced degree at filing and the proposed endeavor—personal career advancement—lacks the national importance required under the first Dhanasar prong.

Senior cloud security architect petitioned for EB-2 NIW by technology company. Petitioner claimed research on AI-driven cybersecurity architectures. AAO found substantial merit but insufficient specificity and no demonstrated national importance beyond employer and clients. Appeal dismissed.

A machine learning research scientist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. The AAO found him qualified as an advanced degree holder with substantial merit work, but dismissed the appeal because his specific proposed endeavor lacked proven national importance despite citations and research funding.

Artificial intelligence researcher with PhD seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. Claimed research endeavor has national importance based on field relevance, citations, and executive order support. AAO found endeavor lacks demonstrated national importance; articles and support letters insufficient to show broader prospective impact on the field itself.

Cloud software developer with master's degree in computer engineering seeking EB-2 advanced degree professional status with national interest waiver for machine learning research. AAO reversed service center on first prong but dismissed appeal because petitioner lacks sufficient track record and advancement capability beyond educational credentials alone.

Security engineer with advanced degree claimed national interest waiver for proposed cloud security research. AAO upheld denial, finding the specific endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance and presented material changes to initial proposal without clear prospective impact beyond the employer.

A systems engineer sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a proposed business providing supply chain management consulting to industrial and commercial companies. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner established exceptional ability but failed to demonstrate national importance of the specific business endeavor despite showing industry importance.

Semiconductor operations project manager with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW. AAO affirmed denial, finding proposed endeavor to innovate chip testing lacks demonstrated national importance. Professional experience and industry importance insufficient; no evidence of broader sectoral or economic impact.

Research scientist with master's degree in electrical and computer engineering proposed to advance privacy-preserving IoT technology. AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but concluded petitioner lacks concrete steps toward employment or demonstrated feasibility, failing the second Dhanasar prong.

A computer scientist proposed developing machine learning algorithms for precision medicine and drug discovery. Although the AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, it affirmed the service center's finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance the research, lacking comparable evidence to established precedent.

IT professional petitioner sought NIW for proposed cybersecurity consulting and training company. AAO affirmed SCOPS denial, finding petitioner failed Dhanasar first prong: national importance lacks evidentiary support. Twelve-employee projection, general industry talent shortage, and letters insufficient to show substantial prospective impact. Second and third prongs reserved.

Communication engineer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO affirmed that petitioner met at least three evidentiary criteria but dismissed appeal, finding totality of evidence does not demonstrate sustained acclaim or rise to very top of field.

Machine learning researcher with master's degree sought EB-2 NIW. AAO found substantial merit and national importance of research and that petitioner was well positioned to advance it, but dismissed appeal because urgency of national interest was not established and labor certification remained practicable.