AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
13 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIJun 2026Remanded
A semiconductor technology researcher with a Ph.D. sought NIW under Dhanasar. USCIS denied, finding advanced degree qualification but failing all three Dhanasar prongs. AAO remanded, finding USCIS did not meaningfully evaluate the record or address petitioner's evidence.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIMay 2026Remanded
Software engineer proposing AI infrastructure development for large language models advancing U.S. innovation seeks NIW under EB-2. AAO remanded because record was incomplete with illegible exhibits and SCOPS did not fully evaluate all three Dhanasar prongs. Petitioner to resubmit clear copies and articulate national importance and balance analysis.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIJan 2026Remanded
Computer scientist with advanced degree proposed developing computer vision and large language models for drug discovery. AAO found SCOPS failed to adequately analyze whether endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, contained contradictory statements on second prong, and insufficiently analyzed third prong. Decision withdrawn and remanded.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIJan 2026Remanded
Software development manager sought EB-2 with NIW. Service center denied for failure to establish advanced degree eligibility, precluding NIW analysis. AAO found service center decision inadequately reasoned; remanded for full review of threshold EB-2 qualification and subsequent NIW determination.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIJan 2026Remanded
Computer science researcher with master's degree in statistics seeks EB-2 national interest waiver for AI-driven medical imaging and prediction models development. SCOPS improperly evaluated first prong by conflating proposed endeavor with petitioner's employment history and applying second-prong factors. AAO remanded for reconsideration of whether specific endeavor has prospective national importance.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIJan 2026Remanded
AI algorithm developer sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for U.S. work. SCOPS found substantial merit and national importance but concluded insufficient evidence of qualification to advance endeavor and that waiver would benefit U.S. AAO remanded because petitioner's employment circumstances changed materially since filing; clarification needed on how endeavor will be pursued.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIDec 2025Remanded
A data scientist with a doctorate in computer science sought an EB-2 NIW by proposing AI-driven drug discovery research. The AAO reversed SCOPS' denial, finding the proposed endeavor clearly described with substantial merit and national importance, and remanded for reconsideration of whether the balance favors waiver.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AINov 2025Remanded
Graduate student researcher in artificial intelligence claimed exceptional ability and national interest waiver. Service center denied without analyzing national importance or waiver discretion. AAO remanded for complete Dhanasar analysis, finding service center misidentified the proposed endeavor and failed to assess specificity and prospective impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIAug 2025Remanded
An advanced degree professional in a STEM field proposes an endeavor with substantial merit and national importance. The AAO remanded because the service center improperly analyzed whether the petitioner is well-positioned to advance the endeavor and failed to adequately explain the balance-of-benefits analysis under Dhanasar.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIJun 2025Remanded
An employer petitions for software engineer beneficiary for EB-2 NIW classification. SCOPS erred by analyzing prior work rather than proposed endeavor, and failed to apply STEM field guidance. AAO withdrew SCOPS decision and remanded for proper analysis of all three Dhanasar prongs with appropriate consideration of software engineering innovation.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIJun 2025Remanded
Senior engineer in AI research seeking NIW under Dhanasar framework for continued research on safe, autonomous AI systems. Service center's denial lacked complete analysis of evidence, made contradictory statements, and failed to address all arguments. Remanded for proper application of all three Dhanasar prongs with complete evidentiary analysis.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIMay 2025Remanded
A petitioner sought NIW EB-2 classification but the service center denied it without adequately analyzing the evidence. The AAO remanded, finding the service center did not properly discuss the petitioner's detailed endeavor description, did not evaluate factors in totality for the second prong, and did not adequately weigh considerations for the third prong.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AISep 2021Remanded
IT systems manager seeks NIW for IT project management and systems analysis services. AAO remanded, finding Director did not adequately explain deficiencies in evidence supporting national importance and prematurely addressed second prong without properly establishing first prong foundation.
0 of 3 criteria metRead →
