Published AAO appeal decisions

Machine learning researcher with Ph.D. seeking NIW for EB-2 classification. Proposed algorithms and system optimization research. AAO held first prong met but petitioner failed second prong; education alone insufficient; lacked evidence of significant grant leadership, documented field impact, or sustained industry interest.

A software developer sought NIW for EB-2 classification. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the specific endeavor lacked national importance; merely working in STEM or on critical emerging technologies without demonstrating broader field impact or substantial economic effects does not suffice.

IT project manager with master's degree in information technology seeks NIW for EB-2 classification to manage IT projects and train workers. AAO dismissed appeal, finding endeavor substantial merit but lacking national importance; project management work does not demonstrate broader impact on IT field or substantial positive economic effects.

A computer scientist and instructor sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO affirmed the Director's finding that the petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional but failed the first Dhanasar prong because she did not present a specific proposed endeavor and her teaching activities lacked broader field impact.

A robotics engineer proposed establishing a U.S.-based company providing remote-control services and consulting. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to establish that the proposed endeavor has national importance; generic field information and personal intentions do not demonstrate projected impact rising to substantial positive economic effects.

Application manager seeks NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification. Proposed IT work providing services to organizations with important missions. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance; while petitioner was highly qualified and IT field important, no evidence showed specific proposed endeavor would impact IT field broadly or create substantial economic or employment benefits nationally.

A database engineer with MBA sought NIW for freelance work and founding an online IT school. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance and petitioner was not well positioned to advance the online school despite having relevant experience and business background.

Computer engineer claimed EB-2 advanced degree or exceptional ability and national interest waiver. AAO held petitioner did not establish advanced degree eligibility, met only one of six exceptional ability criteria, and thus failed to establish first prong of Dhanasar framework, making waiver analysis unnecessary.

Information technology professional sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to meet exceptional ability requirement (at least three of six criteria). Petitioner met only two criteria; did not establish license, comparable evidence, high salary, or recognition by peers. National interest waiver analysis not reached due to lack of prerequisite EB-2 qualification.

IT specialist seeking NIW to fill gap in skilled professionals. Petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance; tentative job offers in project leadership lack documentary evidence of broader field impact beyond employer benefit.

An entrepreneur in business computing sought EB-2 advanced degree or exceptional ability status with national interest waiver. He failed both tracks: his occupation is not a profession under immigration law, he lacks an advanced degree, and he did not meet three criteria for exceptional ability. National interest waiver issue was moot.

Entrepreneur in IT seeking NIW for technology consulting for American companies. Claimed substantial merit and national importance given IT professional shortage. AAO dismissed because proposed consulting work lacked demonstrated national importance; benefits limited to applicant's company and individual clients without broader field impact.

Information technology specialist sought EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked national importance under first Dhanasar prong; petitioner focused on past achievements and field importance rather than specific prospective endeavor impact.

A systems engineer sought EB-2 national interest waiver for advanced degree. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner satisfied the first Dhanasar prong regarding substantial merit and national importance but failed the second prong: insufficient evidence he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.

Petitioner sought classification as advanced degree professional or individual of exceptional ability plus NIW. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 eligibility; did not meet criteria for exceptional ability, and NIW analysis therefore not reached.

Self-employed IT professional seeking EB-2 with NIW based on incomplete bachelor's degree and entrepreneurial experience. Claimed advanced degree eligibility but provided no official academic records or transcript. Failed to document bachelor's degree completion or five years progressive post-baccalaureate experience. NIW analysis not reached because underlying EB-2 qualification not established.

IT systems manager seeks NIW for IT project management and systems analysis services. AAO remanded, finding Director did not adequately explain deficiencies in evidence supporting national importance and prematurely addressed second prong without properly establishing first prong foundation.

An information systems manager with advanced degree seeks NIW for EB-2 classification. She claimed her IT consulting and future business intelligence firm would benefit the U.S. economy through job creation and technological advances. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding her proposed work lacks national importance and adequate documentation of prospective economic impact.

IT project manager sought NIW as EB-2 advanced degree professional. AAO found proposed work in security, IT and fire solutions had substantial merit but lacked evidence of national importance or specific prospective impact. Appeal dismissed for failure to meet first prong of Dhanasar.

An ICT consultant and professor sought NIW under EB-2. The AAO found the proposed endeavor lacked national importance, as the regulatory record did not show impact beyond individual clients and students; benefits did not rise to substantial positive economic effects. Appeal dismissed.

IT project manager sought NIW based on EB-2 advanced degree. AAO found she qualified for underlying EB-2 but dismissed NIW appeal because her proposed IT consulting and research tool development lacked evidence of national importance or broader field impact beyond her employers and clients.

A software developer and entrepreneur sought EB-2 classification as individual with exceptional ability or advanced degree, with national interest waiver. The AAO found the petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability and lacked an advanced degree equivalent; therefore ineligible for underlying classification and national interest waiver analysis was unnecessary.

Information systems manager sought exceptional ability classification and national interest waiver for EB-2. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to describe specific proposed endeavor with national importance, merely asserting occupation-level expertise; also failed to show waiver's balance favored United States.

Entrepreneur seeks NIW and exceptional ability classification. AAO found he did not meet exceptional ability criteria and lacked evidence of national importance for proposed IT entrepreneurship work. Appeal dismissed because specific endeavor lacks substantial national importance.

Electrical engineer seeks NIW for EB-2 based on advanced degree. Petitioner proposed research on computer network frameworks. AAO found proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance under Dhanasar prong one. However, AAO held petitioner failed prong two: insufficient evidence demonstrated he was well positioned to advance the research despite Ph.D., publications, and citations. Appeal dismissed.