Published AAO appeal decisions

A cybersecurity analyst with MBA sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO agreed the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but found no national importance: it would impact only individual clients and customers without demonstrating broader industry implications or implementation strategy. Appeal dismissed.

An IT consultant with an advanced degree sought EB-2 and NIW. The Director approved the underlying advanced degree classification but denied the waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner's proposed IT consulting business lacked evidence of national importance under the first Dhanasar prong.

Technical program manager in data storage sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found petitioner met three evidentiary criteria (judging, scholarly articles, leading critical role), overcoming denial basis. Matter remanded for director to conduct final merits determination assessing sustained acclaim.

A manager in computerized metal cutting and fabrication sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with NIW. The AAO held the petitioner failed to meet three of six evidentiary criteria for exceptional ability, and thus ineligible for underlying EB-2 classification, making Dhanasar prongs unreachable.

An IT consultant entrepreneur sought EB-2 and NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the proposed IT consulting business lacks national importance despite the field's relevance to national security and growth. Applicant provided insufficient evidence of broader field impact or substantial economic effects.

Computer systems manager with 10+ years experience and bachelor's in computer science sought NIW for EB-2. Proposed to start business creating 84 jobs with five-year revenue projections. AAO dismissed because business plan lacked evidence that national importance threshold was met; job creation and wages alone do not establish prospective impact on IT industry.

Chief technology officer with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish national importance of specific proposed endeavor; submitted evidence of IT industry importance and general CTO role significance without demonstrating broader field implications.

An IT entrepreneur seeking EB-2 with NIW. AAO dismissed the appeal, holding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar's first prong because the petitioner failed to establish how specific services would resolve IT worker shortages or create impacts rising to national importance, relying improperly on industry importance rather than endeavor specifics.

Computer user support specialist seeks NIW for EB-2. Petitioner asserted expertise and field importance; claimed endeavor to help organizations implement IT systems nationally. AAO dismissed appeal, finding no evidence the specific endeavor extends beyond client organizations to impact IT industry or economy broadly at national importance level.

A computer network manager proposed advancing his career and disseminating knowledge to field professionals, claiming STEM field status and regional-national impact. The AAO held his endeavor lacks national importance because benefits are limited to employer and clients without probative evidence of broader field impact or job creation details.

An IT project manager sought NIW EB-2 classification proposing entrepreneurial endeavors and project management services. The AAO found the field important but the specific endeavor lacks national importance; petitioner failed to corroborate growth projections or establish impact beyond clients or employer.

A system engineer self-petitioning for NIW sought waiver of job offer for EB-2 classification. She proposed owning and operating a technology education company. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding her proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance because the business plan contained only vague assertions without evidence of prospective impact beyond prospective students, significant employment potential, or substantial economic effects.

Information security specialist sought NIW under EB-2. AAO found his proposed work in IT consulting and cybersecurity has substantial merit but lacks national importance because no documentary evidence shows broader field impact beyond employer benefit. Appeal dismissed.

Product manager with doctorate in robotics and AI sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO found three criteria met (awards, scholarly articles, leading role) but final merits analysis showed achievements insufficient for sustained national/international acclaim at top of field level.

Network communications professional claimed eight criteria for extraordinary ability. Director found two criteria met. Petitioner on appeal reasserted three additional criteria on appeal but failed to overcome deficiencies in evidence or explain how Director erred. AAO held petitioner did not meet the extra criteria and lacked sustained acclaim for top-of-field status.

A computer systems engineer and entrepreneur seeks NIW for EB-2 classification for IT consulting to small businesses. The AAO affirmed the director's finding that the proposed endeavor lacks national importance, as job creation and tax revenue benefits alone do not meet Dhanasar's requirement for prospective impact at the national level.

A cybersecurity professional sought EB-2 advanced degree classification with NIW for operating his own CISO consulting business. The AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance, as it would benefit only specific clients without broader economic or industry impact.

Computer systems manager with advanced degree seeking EB-2 national interest waiver to establish IT consulting company. AAO dismissed appeal, finding substantial merit established but national importance not demonstrated; company activities would benefit only its clients without broader implications for IT industry or significant employment impact.

An assistant professor of computer science sought EB-1A classification. The AAO found he met only the scholarly articles criterion, not the required three criteria, and lacked sustained national or international acclaim demonstrating extraordinary ability at the top of his field, dismissing the appeal.

Machine learning researcher with Ph.D. seeking NIW for EB-2 classification. Proposed algorithms and system optimization research. AAO held first prong met but petitioner failed second prong; education alone insufficient; lacked evidence of significant grant leadership, documented field impact, or sustained industry interest.

A software developer sought NIW for EB-2 classification. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the specific endeavor lacked national importance; merely working in STEM or on critical emerging technologies without demonstrating broader field impact or substantial economic effects does not suffice.