Published AAO appeal decisions

A fraud data analyst with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver for work developing machine learning fraud detection models. She claimed the work addresses important fraud prevention and financial risk. The AAO dismissed, holding her employer-specific role lacks evidence of broader national implications, novel technologies for field-wide adoption, or prospective impact beyond her current position.

A biostatistician with a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering seeking EB-2 with NIW for developing a smartphone ECG device failed to establish national importance. The description lacked specificity, and evidence did not show prospective impact commensurate with national significance.

An employer petitioned for a data scientist beneficiary for EB-2 with national interest waiver under Dhanasar. The AAO confirmed the beneficiary qualified for EB-2 advanced degree status but dismissed because the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient national importance, being employer-specific rather than broadly impactful.

Quantitative researcher with doctorate in statistics seeks NIW for EB-2 classification to develop statistical methodologies for big data research. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance; work restricted by employer covenants and lacks dissemination beyond employer and clients.

Data scientist self-petitioner sought EB-2 NIW based on advanced degree and proposed research in anomaly detection. AAO affirmed denial, holding petitioner did not establish national importance under first Dhanasar prong; research projects lacked specificity and documentation showing broader field or industry impact. Second and third prongs not addressed.

Researcher in hydrometeorology and AI-driven precipitation forecasting with Master's degree sought NIW. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish national importance; work as model tester on NASA-funded projects lacked broader field impact and showed no role as principal investigator or named funding recipient.

Lead data engineer: employer-sponsored EB-2 with national interest waiver claim. Petitioner asserted cloud computing and AI work had national importance. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked national or global implications and benefited only specific employer; first prong failed.

Data scientist seeking NIW for EB-2 classification. AAO affirmed dismissal because proposed endeavor lacks national importance; while substantial merit established, petitioner's work benefits only current employer with no demonstration of innovations or impact extending beyond employer's business interests or clients.

Data engineer seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Established substantial merit of endeavor but not national importance. AAO affirmed dismissal, finding applicant did not demonstrate how employment would reach national importance or provide substantial positive economic effects.

Employer sponsored data science associate in financial services for EB-2 NIW. Beneficiary proposed continuing work in AI, anti-money laundering, and data visualization. AAO dismissed, finding endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; letters contained general assertions without specific evidence of field-wide impact or innovation.

Data scientist pursued doctoral degree while proposing research on human mobility and urban prediction models for national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal because evidence failed to establish prospective impact of the specific endeavor, distinguishing between field importance and actual project importance.

Data analytics manager with advanced degree sought NIW for work managing digital analysts in banking and financial services. AAO found his mentorship and project work have substantial merit but lack national importance, as the endeavor does not demonstrate broader implications for the field or industry beyond individual benefits.

Sustainability and business intelligence consultant sought EB-2 NIW classification. AAO held proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance as required under Dhanasar because petitioner provided only general assertions without adequate evidence of broader field impact or specific prospective consequences.

An employer petitioned for an assistant vice president's EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for developing machine learning and advanced analytics tools for market risk management. The AAO affirmed denial; while the work had substantial merit, employer failed to establish it had national importance or impact beyond the specific employer.