Outcome: Dismissed
MAR072025_01B5203
Our summary
Data scientist pursued doctoral degree while proposing research on human mobility and urban prediction models for national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal because evidence failed to establish prospective impact of the specific endeavor, distinguishing between field importance and actual project importance.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Evidence does not establish prospective impact of specific endeavor; focus on field importance not sufficient
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Evidence does not establish prospective impact of specific endeavor; focus on field importance not sufficient | |
| Not reached / not discussed | First prong failed; second prong not reached on appeal | |
| Not reached / not discussed | First prong failed; third prong not reached on appeal |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
