Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWData science and analyticsIndividualDecided March 2025Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

MAR072025_01B5203

Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Data scientist pursued doctoral degree while proposing research on human mobility and urban prediction models for national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal because evidence failed to establish prospective impact of the specific endeavor, distinguishing between field importance and actual project importance.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Merit and national importance · Evidence does not establish prospective impact of specific endeavor; focus on field importance not sufficient

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot metEvidence does not establish prospective impact of specific endeavor; focus on field importance not sufficient
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedFirst prong failed; second prong not reached on appeal
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedFirst prong failed; third prong not reached on appeal

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.