Published AAO appeal decisions

Geophysicist seeking EB-2 national interest waiver for geophysical data processing consulting. Claimed work has substantial merit but lacks national importance because impact extends only to specific clients in oil and gas industry, not the field broadly. Appeal dismissed.

A petroleum engineer and manager at a multinational company met three initial criteria but lacked national or international acclaim in the aggregate. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding his recognition limited to his employer rather than the field.

Petroleum engineer sought NIW as EB-2 with advanced degree. Met first Dhanasar prong: carbon sequestration research has substantial merit and national importance. Failed second prong: citation record and publications insufficient to show well-positioned status to advance proposed endeavor.

Geologist and petroleum researcher claiming extraordinary ability in hydrocarbon modeling. Failed to meet three criteria threshold. Awards not nationally recognized, judging role informal only, and original contributions lacked major field significance. Appeal dismissed; petitioner did not establish required expertise level.

An analyst in power systems economics and intelligent systems applications sought EB-1A classification, with counsel claiming at least three criteria. The AAO found the journal peer review evidence satisfied the judging criterion, but held the record as a whole did not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing, and dismissed the appeal.