Published AAO appeal decisions

An aeronautical engineer holding an advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO found him eligible for underlying EB-2 classification but concluded his proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar's first prong, as his work benefited only his employer without demonstrating broader industry impact or significant U.S. employment potential. The appeal was dismissed.

Mechanical engineer seeking national interest waiver for EB-2 exceptional ability classification. Petitioner proposed either employment or founding consulting startup. AAO found proposed endeavor lacked specific national importance; generalized industry references insufficient under Dhanasar; appeal dismissed.

A mechanical engineer proposed to work in heavy equipment maintenance and repair. AAO dismissed the appeal because the proposed endeavor lacked national importance; it would impact only his customers and employers, not the automotive industry broadly, and showed no significant U.S. job creation or economic benefits.

Aircraft maintenance specialist sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Claimed endeavor has national importance through aviation industry support and safety. AAO dismissed appeal because specific proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance or broad field impact beyond position.

Mechanical engineer seeking NIW under EB-2 proposing to establish maintenance services company. AAO found proposed endeavor lacks national importance; plan omits critical details on location, scope, employee count, and economic impact. Second-preference eligibility reserved. Appeal dismissed.

Aircraft maintenance consultant seeking NIW for aviation consulting business. Asserted endeavor would employ U.S. workers, advance aviation education, and support FAA and National Center for Advancement of Aviation objectives. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked national importance despite alignment with national initiatives.