Published AAO appeal decisions

Self-represented alien sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification but appealed the denial without substantive arguments or new evidence. AAO summarily dismissed because petitioner failed to identify erroneous conclusions or statements of fact, providing only general assertions of reputation.

A self-represented petitioner, whose occupation is not stated in the decision, sought EB-1A classification as an alien of extraordinary ability. The director found sustained acclaim not established. The appeal contained no argument or evidence, so the AAO summarily dismissed it for failing to identify any specific error. No criteria were analyzed.

Self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Counsel requested 150 days to submit additional evidence and argument but provided no specific items or reasons. AAO dismissed appeal summarily for failure to identify erroneous conclusions of law or fact and failure to submit additional evidence within allotted time.