Published AAO appeal decisions

Self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Appeal dismissed on procedural grounds: Form I-290B and Form G-28 lacked valid original signatures as required by regulation, and foreign language documents relied on blanket translation certificate that did not identify specific documents.

Regulatory services company sponsored employee for EB-2 advanced degree classification. SCOPS and AAO found the beneficiary's master's degree in pharmaceutics does not qualify as regulatory affairs or biomedical sciences as required by the job. Appeal dismissed; not a national interest waiver decision.

A certified flight instructor and pilot with a Master's degree in Aeronautics sought a national interest waiver to work as a designated pilot examiner. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; it benefits individual trainees but lacks broader field or sector impact required by Dhanasar.

An employer petitioned for a websystems administrator under EB-2 advanced degree category with labor certification. The service center revoked approval due to an undisclosed familial relationship between the beneficiary and the petitioner's president. The AAO found the labor certification remained valid but remanded to determine whether either party willfully misrepresented material facts.

A pilot seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed a prior appeal finding no national importance. The motion to reopen, based on filing a subsequent petition, provides no new material facts established at the time of the original filing, so the motion is dismissed.

A restaurant petitioned for an executive chef's O-1A classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal on procedural grounds: signature discrepancies on Form G-28 and Form I-290B prevented recognition of counsel and the appeal itself, rendering the merits unreachable.

A self-petitioner sought a national interest waiver of the job offer requirement. The service center found he qualified for the underlying classification but denied the waiver. On appeal, the AAO dismissed because the signatures on the appeal form and the representation form appeared electronically copied and not valid original handwritten signatures. The merits were not reached.

An operations/technical specialist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. SCOPS contradicted itself, first stating three criteria were met then denying them without analysis. AAO remanded, finding the decision lacked sufficient explanation and analysis required for meaningful appellate review.

Advanced degree professional sought NIW for EB-2 as commercial pilot, flight instructor, and consultant. AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance prong, concluding proposed endeavor lacks sufficient breadth or impact to benefit national economy as required by Dhanasar framework. Appeal dismissed.

An extraordinary ability petitioner, whose occupation is not stated, filed a second combined motion to reopen and reconsider after denial and earlier dismissals. The AAO dismissed it because no new facts were supported by documents and no incorrect application of law or policy was shown; the arguments merely repeated earlier ones.

A self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification, and the service center denied the petition. The appeal was dismissed on procedural grounds because the notice of appeal carried a script-font signature rather than the petitioner's personal signature, so the substantive criteria were never examined.

Airline pilot sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification claiming published material, original contributions, and critical role. AAO affirmed denial, finding no major award and failing to meet three regulatory criteria. Petitioner's safety innovations and comparable evidence claims rejected as insufficient.

Commercial pilot from Panama sought NIW for EB-2. AAO held petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability: only two criteria met (degree and license), not three required. Insufficient evidence of ten years experience, exceptional salary, professional association membership, or industry recognition. Underlying visa eligibility denied; NIW not analyzed.

A geologist sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. After an earlier appeal and several motions were dismissed, the petitioner filed a combined motion to reopen and reconsider. The AAO dismissed both: the delay in the prior late motion was not shown reasonable or beyond his control, and no legal error was identified.

A self-petitioner seeking extraordinary ability classification had the petition denied, then lost an appeal and five motions. This sixth combined motion to reopen and reconsider was dismissed. The AAO found no new facts, no legal or policy error, and no basis to excuse the earlier untimely filing, which was within the petitioner's control.

An airplane pilot sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a proposed aviation training business in Florida. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance. The business plan lacked specifics on wages, worker numbers, location, and how the endeavor would have broader implications beyond the aviation industry.

A nonprofit foundation sought EB-2 classification for a safety and health specialist based on advanced degree. The AAO affirmed denial because the foundation failed to demonstrate ability to pay the proffered wage from tax returns, and a co-executive director's personal commitment to fund the position was insufficient.

Commercial pilot and flight instructor seeks EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. Petitioner failed to establish foreign equivalent to U.S. advanced degree; diploma was three-year credential equivalent to only U.S. bachelor's degree. Intended occupation does not meet profession requirement; petition dismissed.

A petitioner claiming exceptional ability for an EB-2 national interest waiver filed successive motions to reopen and reconsider after initial denials. The AAO dismissed the second motion, finding the petitioner had been given notice of required evidence and a reasonable opportunity to submit it, and that no new facts or legal errors warranted reconsideration.

A self-petitioning professional with an advanced degree sought a national interest waiver. After earlier denial and several dismissed appeals and motions, a fourth combined motion to reopen and reconsider claimed ineffective assistance of prior counsel. The AAO dismissed it because no prejudice or substantial compliance with the required procedure was shown, and the arguments were repeated.

Aircraft mechanic seeking EB-2 NIW claimed training programs and maintenance improvements would address aviation mechanic shortage with national importance. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor lacks sufficient national importance and would not impact field broadly beyond individual trainees or employers.

A truck and heavy machinery mechanic sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed a motion to reopen and reconsider, finding the petitioner did not meet three required criteria and that the mechanic field may not fall within statutory parameters for this visa category.

An individual seeking extraordinary ability classification had a petition denied and an earlier appeal dismissed. Combined motions to reopen and reconsider were filed after the 33-day deadline, and the delay was not shown to be reasonable and beyond the petitioner's control. The AAO dismissed both motions as untimely and for lacking new facts or legal error.

A self-petitioner sought extraordinary ability classification, and the appeal was previously summarily dismissed along with earlier motions. On a second combined motion, the AAO dismissed both the motion to reopen and the motion to reconsider because no new facts, brief, evidence, or legal error were shown. No criteria were decided.