Published AAO appeal decisions

A self-petitioner sought an EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver, and the service center denied it. The AAO dismissed the appeal on procedural grounds, finding the signature on the appeal form was an image copied from other documents rather than an original handwritten signature. The merits of the waiver were not decided.

Regulatory services company sponsored employee for EB-2 advanced degree classification. SCOPS and AAO found the beneficiary's master's degree in pharmaceutics does not qualify as regulatory affairs or biomedical sciences as required by the job. Appeal dismissed; not a national interest waiver decision.

A certified flight instructor and pilot with a Master's degree in Aeronautics sought a national interest waiver to work as a designated pilot examiner. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; it benefits individual trainees but lacks broader field or sector impact required by Dhanasar.

An employer petitioned for a websystems administrator under EB-2 advanced degree category with labor certification. The service center revoked approval due to an undisclosed familial relationship between the beneficiary and the petitioner's president. The AAO found the labor certification remained valid but remanded to determine whether either party willfully misrepresented material facts.

A pilot seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed a prior appeal finding no national importance. The motion to reopen, based on filing a subsequent petition, provides no new material facts established at the time of the original filing, so the motion is dismissed.

A self-petitioner sought a national interest waiver of the job offer requirement. The service center found he qualified for the underlying classification but denied the waiver. On appeal, the AAO dismissed because the signatures on the appeal form and the representation form appeared electronically copied and not valid original handwritten signatures. The merits were not reached.

Advanced degree professional sought NIW for EB-2 as commercial pilot, flight instructor, and consultant. AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance prong, concluding proposed endeavor lacks sufficient breadth or impact to benefit national economy as required by Dhanasar framework. Appeal dismissed.

Commercial pilot from Panama sought NIW for EB-2. AAO held petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability: only two criteria met (degree and license), not three required. Insufficient evidence of ten years experience, exceptional salary, professional association membership, or industry recognition. Underlying visa eligibility denied; NIW not analyzed.

A geologist sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. After an earlier appeal and several motions were dismissed, the petitioner filed a combined motion to reopen and reconsider. The AAO dismissed both: the delay in the prior late motion was not shown reasonable or beyond his control, and no legal error was identified.

An airplane pilot sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a proposed aviation training business in Florida. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance. The business plan lacked specifics on wages, worker numbers, location, and how the endeavor would have broader implications beyond the aviation industry.

A nonprofit foundation sought EB-2 classification for a safety and health specialist based on advanced degree. The AAO affirmed denial because the foundation failed to demonstrate ability to pay the proffered wage from tax returns, and a co-executive director's personal commitment to fund the position was insufficient.

Commercial pilot and flight instructor seeks EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. Petitioner failed to establish foreign equivalent to U.S. advanced degree; diploma was three-year credential equivalent to only U.S. bachelor's degree. Intended occupation does not meet profession requirement; petition dismissed.

A petitioner claiming exceptional ability for an EB-2 national interest waiver filed successive motions to reopen and reconsider after initial denials. The AAO dismissed the second motion, finding the petitioner had been given notice of required evidence and a reasonable opportunity to submit it, and that no new facts or legal errors warranted reconsideration.

A self-petitioning professional with an advanced degree sought a national interest waiver. After earlier denial and several dismissed appeals and motions, a fourth combined motion to reopen and reconsider claimed ineffective assistance of prior counsel. The AAO dismissed it because no prejudice or substantial compliance with the required procedure was shown, and the arguments were repeated.

Aircraft mechanic seeking EB-2 NIW claimed training programs and maintenance improvements would address aviation mechanic shortage with national importance. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor lacks sufficient national importance and would not impact field broadly beyond individual trainees or employers.

A truck and heavy machinery mechanic sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed a motion to reopen and reconsider, finding the petitioner did not meet three required criteria and that the mechanic field may not fall within statutory parameters for this visa category.

An airline pilot sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver to work as a pilot and ground instructor. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to establish that his proposed endeavor addressing pilot shortage had substantial merit or national importance; support letters remained too vague about prospective impact.

An aviation company petitioned for a national interest waiver to employ a copilot with over twenty years of airline experience. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance because it would benefit only one individual with no broader impact on the aviation industry or economy.

A motorcycle mechanic and instructor sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for his own business. The AAO dismissed the appeal after finding he did not meet the underlying EB-2 exceptional ability requirement; therefore it did not reach the Dhanasar waiver prongs.

Petitioner seeks NIW as advanced degree professional. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to establish five years progressive post-baccalaureate experience in specialty as required for underlying EB-2 classification; NIW eligibility not reached.

A commercial airline pilot and captain with advanced qualifications proposed pilot and flight instructor work and aviation safety consultancy. The AAO held his expertise and prior success, while relevant to positioning under the second prong, do not establish national importance of the specific proposed endeavor, which lacks demonstrated broader implications for the aviation industry.

Pilot with advanced degree seeks EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner failed to demonstrate that proposed aviation safety and survival training endeavor has national importance beyond immediate clientele, focusing on specific endeavor rather than industry importance.

Rope access specialist sought EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO held endeavor lacks national importance because general industry benefits do not demonstrate prospective impact commensurate with national scope. Appeal dismissed without reaching second and third Dhanasar prongs.

Pilot seeking NIW to provide aviation instruction services. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar because instruction would not impact the field more broadly and occupational shortages are addressed through labor certification.

A self-petitioner sought an EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The service center denied it as not well positioned, then dismissed a combined motion. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner did not challenge the finding that the motion stated no new facts, so the issue was waived.