Published AAO appeal decisions

An entrepreneur from Uzbekistan with a master's degree sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for an independent transportation business using IT expertise. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance despite having substantial merit, lacking credible economic impact.

Regulatory services company sponsored employee for EB-2 advanced degree classification. SCOPS and AAO found the beneficiary's master's degree in pharmaceutics does not qualify as regulatory affairs or biomedical sciences as required by the job. Appeal dismissed; not a national interest waiver decision.

Petitioner holds advanced degree and seeks NIW for research developing fairer face recognition systems through synthetic data and bias mitigation. SCOPS found substantial merit but denied national importance. AAO affirmed dismissal, ruling petitioner conflated field importance with specific endeavor importance and lacked sufficient evidence of prospective impact.

An IT project manager with an advanced degree proposed work improving local government services through technology implementation. The AAO rejected her claim that this had national importance, finding her work would benefit only her employer and its clients without broader industry or regional implications.

Cryptography researcher pursuing PhD seeks EB-2 advanced degree and NIW for research developing secure communication and privacy tools. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance. However, petitioner lacks documented postdoctoral position or specific employment commitment, failing to establish he is well-positioned to advance the work.

Civil engineer holding advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW. SCOPS granted advanced degree qualification but denied waiver for lack of national importance. AAO affirmed: petitioner showed merit of field and his capability to advance work but failed to establish specific proposed endeavor has broader implications or national importance needed under Dhanasar first prong. Appeal dismissed.

A meat industry executive and business owner sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. The AAO found he did not meet the underlying EB-2 requirement and did not analyze the NIW prong, reserving it as unnecessary after finding him ineligible for the base classification.

Computer science Ph.D. candidate proposed research in AI-enhanced network performance. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but rejected petition because petitioner lacks sufficient record of research success or progress to be well positioned to advance the work.

Graduate student researcher in structural engineering sought EB-2 NIW for developing sustainable concrete materials and construction methods. AAO found proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, but petitioner failed second prong by lacking documented plan, progress, and stakeholder interest to advance the endeavor.

Supply chain manager and entrepreneur proposes consulting and training services for soybean processing. AAO held proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; petitioner failed to establish substantial economic effects or workforce impact beyond regional direct clients.

A psychology professor with Ph.D. sought EB-2 national interest waiver for research on data science and ecological threats. AAO found proposed research has substantial merit and national importance but determined petitioner lacks evidence of being well-positioned to advance endeavor; appeal dismissed.

Marketing entrepreneur seeks NIW for digital marketing business in New Jersey. Petition claimed substantial merit and national importance. AAO found substantial merit but no national importance; business serves only individual clients without broader field impact or substantial economic effects warranting waiver.

A Ph.D. student in petroleum engineering sought NIW claiming research in energy storage advances national interest. AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but rejected the petition because the applicant failed to show sufficient progress, citation record, or field interest to demonstrate being well-positioned to advance the proposed research.

An optical physicist with a master's degree sought NIW for research in optical sciences. The AAO found the research has substantial merit and national importance but dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate being well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.

A CFO and entrepreneur in real estate development with an advanced degree sought a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding the proposed endeavor of developing residential and commercial properties has substantial merit but lacks national importance; it benefits the applicant's clientele without demonstrating broader economic or field impact.

A certified flight instructor and pilot with a Master's degree in Aeronautics sought a national interest waiver to work as a designated pilot examiner. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; it benefits individual trainees but lacks broader field or sector impact required by Dhanasar.

Architectural designer with two master's degrees seeking NIW to advance sustainable design in United States. AAO affirmed SCOPS determination that endeavor lacks national importance because impact limited to specific employer and clients, without broader field implications or substantial economic effects.

Brazilian-trained attorney sought NIW for family law mediation practice in Delaware. Qualified for underlying EB-2 advanced degree classification. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner failed to show proposed endeavor has national importance, lacking evidence of broader impact beyond local services or how foreign law expertise benefits U.S. practice.

A hospitalist sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO held the proposed endeavor lacked national importance because it would not impact the field broadly or produce substantial prospective economic effects, despite serving an underserved area. First prong of Dhanasar test failed.

A rigging artist and entrepreneur in entertainment sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed dismissal because his proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite working in an important field, and he failed to demonstrate he is well positioned to advance it through education, planning, or demonstrated progress.

A mechanical engineering researcher with an advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding she was not well-positioned to advance her proposed sustainable energy research endeavor, and declining to reach the first and third prongs.

An environmental designer with an advanced degree proposed to operate an eco-friendly interior design company. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the business lacks demonstrated national importance; the business plan shows only local market impact without evidence of broader economic, societal, or field-wide implications.

A senior artificial intelligence engineer sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for research in AI technologies for spatial-temporal understanding. The AAO dismissed, finding the petitioner established the first prong required substantial merit but failed to prove national importance of his specific proposed endeavor.

International tax law consultant sought national interest waiver for EB-2 advanced degree petition. AAO affirmed denial, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite substantial merit and positioning. Work benefits confined to employer; no evidence of broader field or national implications required.

Chemical engineer with Ph.D. seeks NIW for renewable synthetic fuels research under Dhanasar framework. First prong met: proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance. Second prong failed: education alone insufficient; citations lack comparative metrics; no demonstrated record of research success at level required.