Published AAO appeal decisions

Commercial specialist with advanced degree seeks EB-2 NIW classification. Petitioner met advanced degree professional standard but failed national importance prong of Dhanasar framework. Decision held that past achievements improving single employer's operations do not demonstrate broader field impact or national-level implications required for NIW.

Employer petitioned for materials science researcher seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO agreed the beneficiary met three initial criteria but dismissed the appeal, finding the final merits analysis showed insufficient sustained national or international acclaim and that the record relied on speculative future accomplishments rather than established current acclaim.

Pianist sought extraordinary ability classification claiming published material, leading roles, and artistic exhibitions. AAO found no criteria satisfied. Published materials lacked required circulation data; concert performances were regional with no evidence of distinguished organization roles. Record showed local media coverage and restaurant employment, insufficient for sustained national or international acclaim.

An accountant in financial services sought EB-2 NIW based on proposing AI-driven credit risk assessment research for Treasury Department. The AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance because it would not extend beyond work with a single government entity to impact the field broadly.

An auto repair entrepreneur claimed exceptional ability through three regulatory criteria and sought a national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding the degree unrelated to auto repair, insufficient ten-year experience evidence, and no demonstrated expertise significantly above the field, failing the prerequisite exceptional ability test.

A CEO of a specialty lighting company seeking to expand consulting services in commercial management, partnership enablement, and export consulting claimed a national interest waiver. The AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance because the company would serve only specific clients without broader implications for the industry or U.S. economy.

CEO sought EB-2 exceptional ability with national interest waiver. AAO held petitioner met only one of six regulatory criteria for exceptional ability; failed to establish ten years experience, relevant licensure, comparative salary evidence, qualifying membership, or achievements; could not proceed to NIW analysis.

Commercial pilot sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO held petitioner lacked requisite advanced degree or bachelor's degree equivalent and failed to demonstrate national importance of proposed work as pilot and instructor, lacking evidence of industry-wide impact.

A video game production company sought EB-1A classification for an environment concept art lead. The petitioner claimed five criteria on appeal. The AAO found only the critical role criterion met. Insufficient evidence of three required criteria led the AAO to dismiss the appeal.

Entrepreneur with nursing background in medical device sales seeks NIW. Claimed medical sales endeavor has national importance despite prior success and field contributions. AAO dismissed, finding no showing of broader field implications, scientific advancement, or substantial economic effects beyond direct service recipients.

Dance studio petitioned for dance instructor beneficiary for O-1A classification. Service center found one criterion met. AAO affirmed that beneficiary met only one criterion and rejected original contributions claim based on lack of evidence of major significance. Petition dismissed as beneficiary failed to satisfy three-criterion requirement.

Environmental consultant with advanced degree sought NIW for EB-2. First prong established but failed second prong: no demonstrated environmental consulting skills, business formation steps, or evidence of customer interest despite business plan and language fluency. Appeal dismissed.

An obstetric nurse sought EB-2 NIW status to operate a doula and midwifery practice. The AAO found her advanced degree qualification was established but the proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar because her work would only benefit direct clients, not the field broadly, and her stated innovations were too vague.

An information security analyst sought EB-2 with NIW based on advanced degree status and proposed endeavor. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish eligibility for the underlying EB-2 classification; foreign credential evaluation lacked probative value and did not demonstrate equivalency to U.S. bachelor's degree, so NIW analysis was not reached.

Entrepreneur in wallpaper industry seeking EB-2 NIW presented inconsistent proposed endeavors: wallpaper business and finance treasurer role. The AAO dismissed the appeal because petitioner failed to consistently describe the specific proposed endeavor, preventing assessment of substantial merit and national importance.

An accountant with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW to expand an accounting firm serving multilingual communities across Massachusetts, Florida, and Georgia. The AAO dismissed because serving individual clients lacks national importance; projected eighteen employees and profits insignificant relative to the 144.5-billion-dollar industry.

Entrepreneur in accounting/business qualified as advanced degree professional but failed NIW. Motion to reopen and reconsider dismissed because Petitioner offered previously submitted arguments without new evidence showing national importance or substantial positive economic effects.

A water polo coach sought EB-2 NIW to establish a water polo club in Georgia. The AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance because projected employment of one coach and modest revenue did not demonstrate significant economic impact or broader field implications.

A financial manager consultant claimed EB-2 classification as individual of exceptional ability and sought NIW. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability; she did not meet three criteria and lacked expertise significantly above ordinary levels in her field.

Entrepreneur in finance seeks EB-2 NIW to establish independent financial advisory firm. Petitioner claimed substantial merit and national importance but provided conflicting descriptions of the proposed endeavor across petition, business plan, and appeal brief. AAO dismissed appeal because inconsistencies preclude establishing that the endeavor has substantial merit and national importance.

Healthcare lobbying specialist in Brazil seeks EB-2 NIW. Claimed STEM field designation and pharmaceutical economics focus establish national importance. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor lacks prospective impact on industry or economy beyond client work; STEM designation alone insufficient without demonstrated broader field impact.

Computer systems networking entrepreneur sought EB-2 with NIW for IT consulting startup. AAO held he failed first Dhanasar prong: proposed endeavor, though in prioritized STEM field, lacked national importance because it would benefit direct clients and trainees only, not broader field implications.

A pastor sought NIW classification for a pastoral counseling firm in Pennsylvania. The applicant claimed substantial social and cultural value. The AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance, finding no evidence of broader field impact, job creation potential, or substantial economic effects beyond specific clients.

Information security analyst seeking EB-2 NIW. Claimed expertise and cybersecurity work have national importance aligned with government initiatives. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance; expertise and aspiration do not establish industry-wide or national implications beyond his own career and clients.

A legal analyst and entrepreneur sought NIW under Dhanasar, claiming advanced degree status and national importance of proposed legal consulting business. AAO dismissed because proposed endeavor lacked broader implications beyond company clientele; no substantial positive economic effects at national level demonstrated.