AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
6,280 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-1AArts, design, architectureJan 2026Dismissed
A modeling student petitioner claimed four EB-1A criteria but failed to provide properly certified translations of foreign language documents supporting awards, membership, and judging claims. The AAO affirmed dismissal because none of the criteria were sufficiently established, falling short of the required three.
0 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWFinance and economicsJan 2026Dismissed
Actuarial associate sought EB-2 with national interest waiver to provide AI and machine learning solutions improving pension program solvency for public servants. The AAO dismissed, holding the petitioner failed to demonstrate the proposed endeavor has national importance; letters of support and general field importance do not establish the specific endeavor's broader implications.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMechanical and aerospace engineeringJan 2026Dismissed
Aerospace engineer and robotics researcher sought EB-2 with national interest waiver to research autonomous decision-making algorithms. The AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to show he was well positioned to advance the research through publications with minimal citations and insufficient evidence of research impact.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementJan 2026Dismissed
A senior lead consultant sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner met only one of the needed three exceptional ability criteria, with salary and recognition evidence insufficient. It therefore did not reach the waiver analysis under the Dhanasar framework.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementJan 2026Dismissed
A business legal consultant self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability. She claimed eight criteria but the AAO found she did not meet the minimum three evidentiary criteria and lacked sustained national or international acclaim or a place among the small percentage at the top of her field.
0 of 9 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWAgriculture and foodJan 2026Dismissed
Veterinarian entrepreneur seeks EB-2 national interest waiver to establish rural veterinary services firm in New York. Proposed providing affordable livestock veterinary care and food safety services. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; projected employment and revenue insufficient to demonstrate impact beyond local clients.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsJan 2026Dismissed
An audio-visual agency filed for a cinematographer and drone cameraman with extraordinary ability. The AAO found he met two criteria (judging and exhibitions) but failed the third-criterion threshold and final merits test for sustained acclaim at field leadership level.
2 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIJan 2026Dismissed
Petitioner is an applied scientist with a master's degree in computer science proposing AI research. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to establish that his specific proposed endeavor has national importance; generalized claims about AI advancement without detailed prospective work plans are insufficient.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIJan 2026Dismissed
AI manufacturer petitioned for beneficiary's EB-2 national interest waiver. Beneficiary qualified for underlying EB-2 but failed NIW Dhanasar first prong; proposed work lacked demonstrated national importance and broader implications beyond company and clients.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABiotech and pharmaJan 2026Dismissed
Pharmaceutical research scientist sought EB-1A classification claiming three criteria. AAO dismissed appeal, finding only judging and scholarly articles met but original contributions lacked evidence of major significance and sustained national or international acclaim.
2 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AEducation and academiaJan 2026Dismissed
Ethnomusicology researcher meets four initial criteria (publications, judging, scholarly articles, critical role) but AAO held totality of evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or small-percentage-at-top status: publication record typical for specialized field, media coverage lacks comparative context, and judging not shown to be prestigious.
4 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1ALife sciences and medicineJan 2026Dismissed
Physician and research fellow in immunology sought EB-1A classification. Met two criteria: published material and judging. Awards not recognized for field excellence; original contributions not demonstrated as major significance. Failed three-criterion threshold. Appeal dismissed.
2 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1AChemistry and materialsJan 2026Dismissed
A cosmetics expert claimed extraordinary ability through seven criteria. The petitioner established judging and scholarly articles but failed awards and published material. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the record insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.
2 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureJan 2026Dismissed
Novelist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner met only two of ten criteria and failed to satisfy the required minimum of three. Membership criterion failed because published works do not constitute outstanding achievements; contributions criterion failed for lack of demonstrated major significance in field.
0 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWCivil and environmental engineeringJan 2026Dismissed
Civil engineer with Ph.D. sought NIW for research on structural reliability and truck platooning safety. AAO found endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to show he was well positioned to advance it or that waiving labor certification would benefit the nation.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementJan 2026Dismissed
Petitioner seeks NIW as EB-2 member with advanced degree, proposing to provide real estate consulting services through his company. SCOPS found substantial merit but denied national importance and waiver. AAO upheld dismissal, finding petitioner failed to demonstrate broader field or economic impact rising to national importance level.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEnergy and climateJan 2026Dismissed
Electrical engineer sought NIW for research on power grid efficiency and sustainability. AAO dismissed appeal because proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite alignment with climate goals, and evidence demonstrates past qualifications rather than prospective impact of specific proposed work.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWElectrical and electronic engineeringJan 2026Dismissed
Electrical engineer with doctoral degree proposes power grid research on renewable energy integration. AAO found substantial merit and national importance met, but rejected well-positioned prong due to insufficient evidence of research success and impact, and rejected balance prong as contributions do not outweigh labor certification benefits.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIJan 2026Dismissed
Employer-sponsored semiconductor engineer with master's degree seeks EB-2 national interest waiver for system-level test development work. Claimed endeavor has national importance due to semiconductor industry value and testing standard implications. AAO found importance of field insufficient; specific proposed endeavor lacks demonstrated broader prospective impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIJan 2026Dismissed
Software developer seeks NIW for EB-2 to develop universal AI architecture addressing bias in algorithms. AAO dismissed appeal, holding the specific proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite alignment with important AI field; merely working in an important industry insufficient.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWLife sciences and medicineJan 2026Dismissed
Graduate student in epidemiology sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for research on cancer and aging-related diseases. AAO found the proposed research endeavor had national importance but dismissed the appeal because the petitioner, as a student without principal investigator experience or concrete evidence of pursuing postdoctoral employment, was not well-positioned to advance it.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementJan 2026Dismissed
Aging services manager with recent advanced degree seeks EB-2 NIW to advance elder care nationally. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to establish that proposed endeavor has national importance or that she is well-positioned to advance it; lacks innovation evidence, customer interest, or realized progress.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWElectrical and electronic engineeringJan 2026Dismissed
An electrical engineer with a foreign Master's degree sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed research endeavor lacks the national or global implications required to establish national importance, and the petitioner is not well-positioned to advance it.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIJan 2026Dismissed
Machine learning engineer sought EB-2 with NIW for AI-driven smart vehicle manufacturing research. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of the specific proposed endeavor, conflating field importance with endeavor-specific impact under Dhanasar's first prong.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AFinance and economicsJan 2026Dismissed
Asset management managing partner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. The AAO found he met three initial criteria but dismissed the motion to reconsider because the totality of evidence did not show sustained national or international acclaim or that he is among the very top of the field.
3 of 4 criteria metRead →
