Published AAO appeal decisions

Sociologist with PhD focused on women and policy in Bangladesh sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO found she met only two of ten criteria and lacked the sustained national or international acclaim required for the small percentage at the very top of her field.

Financial manager sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed five criteria; SCOPS found only published material met, but AAO reversed that finding. AAO concluded petitioner satisfied no criteria and lacked the sustained national or international acclaim required for this highly restrictive classification.

Senior data analyst seeks NIW for EB-2 classification to develop machine learning models for diabetes risk prediction. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of proposed endeavor and insufficient evidence of being well positioned to advance it despite holding master degrees and modest publication record.

An entrepreneur in language education and cultural immersion training sought an EB-2 NIW. The AAO agreed the endeavor had merit but found it lacked the specific detail, evidence, and prospective impact necessary to establish national importance under Dhanasar's first prong, which is dispositive.

A graduate student in biomedical engineering seeks NIW for research on photoacoustic imaging in clinical settings. The AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but dismissed because the petitioner did not demonstrate she is well-positioned to advance it, lacking a Ph.D., documented employment, or evidence of progress or investor interest.

Automotive design engineer seeking extraordinary ability classification met only two of ten evidentiary criteria. Appeal dismissed because petitioner failed to provide brief or additional evidence and did not meet the three-criterion threshold required for EB-1A eligibility.

Computer scientist with master's degree in engineering proposed advancing AI research in deep learning for data analysis and virtual assistants. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but petitioner is not well positioned to advance it due to insufficient record of success and impact. Appeal dismissed on second prong failure.

Medical director and research scientist petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. She met three evidentiary criteria through judging, scholarly articles, and high salary, but the AAO held she failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim or position among the small percentage at the very top of her field.

An artificial intelligence researcher sought EB-2 with national interest waiver without labor certification. The AAO affirmed the service center's finding that the proposed research endeavor lacked the substantial merit and national importance required under Dhanasar's first prong, dismissing the appeal.

Computer scientist employed as engineering associate proposed developing proprietary software for AI safety and trust. AAO affirmed denial because proposed work lacked national importance, benefiting only the specific employer despite national footprint, even though petitioner was well positioned.

Attorney specializing in intellectual property and cybercrime seeking EB-2 NIW proposed consulting business with claimed job creation and tax benefits. AAO dismissed, finding endeavor lacks sufficient national importance and evidence does not demonstrate broader impact on field beyond specific business and clients.

A software engineer was the beneficiary of an EB-1A petition filed by an AI software company, which the service center denied for failing three of ten criteria. The AAO dismissed the appeal as moot because a separate immigrant petition was approved and the beneficiary became a permanent resident, so no criteria were decided.

A historian and rabbi in Jewish studies sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO dismissed because the petitioner satisfied none of four claimed evidentiary criteria and failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or positioning among the very top of the field.

A veterinarian sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. She met three initial criteria: judging, scholarly articles, and leading critical role. However, the AAO dismissed her appeal because the totality of evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that she ranked among the very top of her veterinary field.

Secondary school teacher seeking NIW as EB-2 advanced degree professional to implement STEM program. Qualified for EB-2 but failed first Dhanasar prong: program benefits constrained to participating schools and students; scalability and alignment with federal priorities insufficient for national importance. Appeal dismissed.

AI robotics entrepreneur claims EB-2 exceptional ability. Petitioner meets advanced degree criterion but fails to meet three of six exceptional ability criteria required for classification. Bachelor's degree in aeronautics not demonstrated to relate to robotics endeavor. Comparable evidence for remaining criteria insufficient. Categorical ineligibility established; NIW not reached.

A contemporary oil painter claimed seven criteria; service center found four met. AAO affirmed denial, concluding the petitioner's exhibitions lacked prestige evidence, judging was preliminary-level only, and achievements did not distinguish him from peers or demonstrate sustained acclaim or top-tier status.

Graduate research assistant in cybersecurity sought EB-2 with NIW for autonomous vehicle security research. AAO found substantial merit but dismissed because petitioner failed to establish national importance of specific proposed endeavor or demonstrate being well-positioned to advance it under Dhanasar framework.

Physician-researcher proposing cancer research claims national interest waiver. AAO found first prong met: research has national importance. However, second prong failed: evidence from references lacked specific examples of research impact or progress, and citation metrics did not adequately demonstrate exceptional success.

A drug addiction treatment center petitioned for an EB-2 national interest waiver for an IT operations manager beneficiary. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance; recommendation letters focused on the beneficiary's individual qualifications and organizational impact only, not industry-wide or profession-wide benefit.

Plant scientist in agronomy seeks EB-1A classification. Petitioner claimed five criteria including judging and scholarly articles already found met by SCOPS. AAO held original contributions lacked evidence of major field significance and leading role unsupported, leaving only two criteria met when three required.

Supply chain consultant with advanced degree sought EB-2 classification and NIW. Petitioner claimed substantial merit and national importance of proposed supply chain consulting business. AAO agreed substantial merit established but found record did not demonstrate national importance; business impact limited to individual clients without broader economic or field-wide implications.

Aircraft maintenance technician sought EB-2 NIW classification. Petitioner claimed exceptional ability but lacked degree of expertise significantly above ordinary in the field. Proposed endeavor for aircraft repair facility and predictive maintenance technologies lacked evidence of national importance under Dhanasar framework; impact limited to local business.