Published AAO appeal decisions

Supply chain manager and entrepreneur proposes consulting and training services for soybean processing. AAO held proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; petitioner failed to establish substantial economic effects or workforce impact beyond regional direct clients.

A CEO and founder of a U.S. corporation sought EB-1A classification based on extraordinary ability in business. Although meeting published material criterion, the AAO affirmed SCOPS finding that evidence lacked the sustained national or international acclaim and recognition required to place petitioner among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

A psychology professor with Ph.D. sought EB-2 national interest waiver for research on data science and ecological threats. AAO found proposed research has substantial merit and national importance but determined petitioner lacks evidence of being well-positioned to advance endeavor; appeal dismissed.

Marketing entrepreneur seeks NIW for digital marketing business in New Jersey. Petition claimed substantial merit and national importance. AAO found substantial merit but no national importance; business serves only individual clients without broader field impact or substantial economic effects warranting waiver.

A Ph.D. student in petroleum engineering sought NIW claiming research in energy storage advances national interest. AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but rejected the petition because the applicant failed to show sufficient progress, citation record, or field interest to demonstrate being well-positioned to advance the proposed research.

An optical physicist with a master's degree sought NIW for research in optical sciences. The AAO found the research has substantial merit and national importance but dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate being well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.

A CFO and entrepreneur in real estate development with an advanced degree sought a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding the proposed endeavor of developing residential and commercial properties has substantial merit but lacks national importance; it benefits the applicant's clientele without demonstrating broader economic or field impact.

A certified flight instructor and pilot with a Master's degree in Aeronautics sought a national interest waiver to work as a designated pilot examiner. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; it benefits individual trainees but lacks broader field or sector impact required by Dhanasar.

An honorary research professor in classical studies claimed seven evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability. The service center accepted judging and scholarly articles. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the contested awards, membership, contributions and leading-role criteria unmet, so the three-criterion threshold failed and final merits were not reached.

A post-doctoral researcher in engineering mechanics sought EB-1A classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner met only one of three claimed criteria and failed to demonstrate that his original contributions had major significance, falling short of the three-criterion threshold.

Architectural designer with two master's degrees seeking NIW to advance sustainable design in United States. AAO affirmed SCOPS determination that endeavor lacks national importance because impact limited to specific employer and clients, without broader field implications or substantial economic effects.

An economist in financial inclusion and innovation sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to satisfy at least three of ten evidentiary criteria and did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for this highly restrictive classification.

Brazilian-trained attorney sought NIW for family law mediation practice in Delaware. Qualified for underlying EB-2 advanced degree classification. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner failed to show proposed endeavor has national importance, lacking evidence of broader impact beyond local services or how foreign law expertise benefits U.S. practice.

A hospitalist sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO held the proposed endeavor lacked national importance because it would not impact the field broadly or produce substantial prospective economic effects, despite serving an underserved area. First prong of Dhanasar test failed.

A rigging artist and entrepreneur in entertainment sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed dismissal because his proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite working in an important field, and he failed to demonstrate he is well positioned to advance it through education, planning, or demonstrated progress.

A mechanical engineering researcher with an advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding she was not well-positioned to advance her proposed sustainable energy research endeavor, and declining to reach the first and third prongs.

An environmental designer with an advanced degree proposed to operate an eco-friendly interior design company. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the business lacks demonstrated national importance; the business plan shows only local market impact without evidence of broader economic, societal, or field-wide implications.

Automotive technician and repairer claiming extraordinary ability in auto body design and restoration. Claimed five initial criteria plus one additional. AAO held petitioner meets only one criterion (judging); awards lack national recognition, membership fails requirements, published articles lack proper attribution. Does not meet three-criterion threshold.

A senior artificial intelligence engineer sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for research in AI technologies for spatial-temporal understanding. The AAO dismissed, finding the petitioner established the first prong required substantial merit but failed to prove national importance of his specific proposed endeavor.

International tax law consultant sought national interest waiver for EB-2 advanced degree petition. AAO affirmed denial, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite substantial merit and positioning. Work benefits confined to employer; no evidence of broader field or national implications required.

Chemical engineer with Ph.D. seeks NIW for renewable synthetic fuels research under Dhanasar framework. First prong met: proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance. Second prong failed: education alone insufficient; citations lack comparative metrics; no demonstrated record of research success at level required.

Applied and computational mathematician self-petitioned for EB-2 NIW to research guaranteed algorithms for large-scale systems, claiming prospective applications in cancer research, energy, and artificial intelligence. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding substantial merit but insufficient evidence of national importance because the connection between the proposed research and asserted national-level impacts was too attenuated.

Research professor seeks NIW for EB-2 self-employment in research projects spanning orthopedic implants, prosthetics, and aerospace composites. Petitioner claimed alignment with government initiatives and field importance. AAO dismissed, finding specific endeavor lacks demonstrated national importance; general field alignment and U.S. initiative alignment insufficient without detailed prospective impact documentation.

A family nurse practitioner seeks EB-2 advanced degree classification and NIW. Service center approved underlying EB-2 eligibility but denied NIW. AAO affirmed, finding petitioner's proposed primary care practice using telemedicine lacked national importance; evidence showed only individual patient benefit, not broader healthcare industry impact.

Model self-petitioner claimed four criteria; SCOPS found none met. AAO analyzed published material and commercial success, rejecting both; declined to reach remaining criteria as threshold three criteria not satisfied.