Published AAO appeal decisions

Entrepreneur seeks NIW for EB-2 classification to operate business consulting and professional development company. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite alignment with federal programs; focus on specific undertaking rather than general business importance is determinative.

Automotive engineer sought EB-2 NIW for autonomous vehicle research and development. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner provided only broad, general claims without a specific, detailed proposed endeavor required under Dhanasar framework.

Mechanical engineer from Brazil proposing industrial maintenance services, consulting, and workforce training business seeking EB-2 NIW. AAO found petitioner lacked five years progressive experience for advanced degree professional basis. On merits, proposed endeavor lacks sufficient documentary evidence of national importance; workforce shortage alone insufficient; no showing of significant employment or regional economic benefit.

A software developer with advanced degree claims NIW for low-code platform development work. AAO affirmed SCOPS' denial, finding the endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance, as supporting letters conflate field importance with specific endeavor impact and job creation claims lack corroboration.

A petitioner sought EB-2 advanced degree or exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver under Dhanasar. The AAO dismissed the motion to reopen, finding the petitioner resubmitted identical documentation already in the record without new facts supported by evidence, and failed to comply with Form I-290B instructions for filing additional materials.

Semiconductor engineer with advanced degree in physics seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. Proposed developing semiconductor chips for telecommunications and computing. AAO found endeavor aligned with industry priorities but lacked demonstrated substantial national importance beyond incremental contributions. Appeal dismissed.

A data scientist with an advanced degree sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed the service center denial, finding the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance because the petitioner provided no evidence of prospective impact beyond the employer or significant economic effects.

General manager and logistician in delivery and transportation sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO found substantial merit in endeavor but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of his specific business beyond local clientele.

Research and development manager in software engineering from China working on machine learning for insurance industry risk assessment. Met first Dhanasar prong on substantial merit and national importance but failed second prong; citations and education alone insufficient to demonstrate well-positioned status. Appeal dismissed.

Adapted physical education specialist and entrepreneur proposes health and wellness centers for special needs children in Florida, Massachusetts, and Georgia. Claimed national interest waiver for EB-2. AAO affirmed denial, finding endeavor lacks national importance despite substantial merit; business plan lacks evidence of broader field impact or economic scale reaching national significance.

Infrastructure specialist proposed IT consulting firm offering system design, project management, and cybersecurity services. Sought EB-2 NIW but petitioner failed to establish specific endeavor had national importance beyond potential client benefit. AAO dismissed, finding insufficient prospective impact on IT field or economy.

Assistant professor of Arabic languages seeks waiver based on language instruction and curriculum development supporting military personnel readiness. Claimed endeavor involves research on cross-cultural communication and specialized translation. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor has commendable ambitions but lacks documented prospective impact rising to national importance.

A forecasting and data analysis researcher sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO dismissed, finding the first Dhanasar prong met but the second and third prongs unmet: insufficient evidence of being well-positioned to advance the endeavor and that a waiver would benefit the United States.

Postdoctoral researcher with advanced degrees seeks NIW for CAR T cell research involving epigenetic reprogramming. AAO found endeavor meets national importance but failed to demonstrate she is well positioned to advance it despite citations and peer review participation.

Chemical engineer self-petitioner sought NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification. AAO affirmed denial because petitioner failed to establish national importance of proposed endeavor due to vague, inconsistent description of multiple different jobs, and failed to show he was well positioned to advance any coherent endeavor without demonstrated government interest or fellowship offer.

A climate change policy analyst sought NIW under EB-2. SCOPS denied the petition solely for defective attorney signatures (photocopied rather than original handwritten). The AAO remanded the matter, holding SCOPS should have processed the petition as if the defective notice of representation had not been submitted.

An attorney with advanced degrees seeks NIW to develop AI legal technology. AAO dismissed appeal, holding that while industry importance aligns with government priorities, petitioner failed demonstrating specific proposed endeavor's prospective impact at national importance level required by Dhanasar.

An EV industry consultant sought an EB-2 national interest waiver to improve production and efficiency in the electric vehicle sector. The AAO affirmed denial because the proposed endeavor, while addressing national concerns, lacked demonstrated national importance and broader field implications beyond specific client work.

An agribusiness CEO sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed a motion to reconsider, affirming that the petitioner failed to establish national importance because his updated business plan remained uncorroborated and lacked evidence of broader field implications beyond his clients.

Petitioner sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Motion to reconsider argued prior AAO decision misapplied the Dhanasar framework and evidentiary standards. AAO dismissed because petitioner merely reargued facts already considered and failed to identify specific legal or policy errors in the prior decision.

A petroleum engineer with master's degree in sustainable energy sought NIW for EB-2, planning to join an oil-gas company or establish a consulting firm. The AAO dismissed appeal after finding proposed endeavor in energy optimization and well integrity lacks national importance. Alignment with federal energy priorities and professional qualifications insufficient without concrete prospective impact.

An IT specialist and entrepreneur sought NIW for enterprise architecture and SAP transformation advisory services. AAO dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate national importance of the specific proposed endeavor; lack of evidence corroborating job creation projections and economic impact claims.

Sustainable design consultant with experience in architecture and urban planning seeks to transform U.S. urban housing through sustainable, recycled materials like shipping containers. Claimed endeavor has national importance. AAO dismissed appeal, finding endeavor lacks demonstrated national importance and broader field implications required by Dhanasar.

A computer scientist with Ph.D. in STEM sought EB-2 national interest waiver for research endeavor. The AAO dismissed, finding he failed the second Dhanasar prong. Though his Ph.D. and publications were favorable factors, he lacked consistent independent research funding or demonstrated government interest to advance his proposed endeavor.

Entrepreneur and operations manager proposing eco-friendly swimwear manufacturing and distribution business claiming national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal, finding endeavor lacks national importance; sustainability claims vague and speculative, niche market focus insufficient for material influence on industry or economy at national scale.