AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
3,433 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-2 NIWFinance and economicsSep 2021Dismissed
A financial manager claiming advanced degree and NIW proposed to provide financial services to U.S. companies and individuals. The AAO affirmed dismissal, holding the endeavor lacked national importance and would not impact the finance field broadly despite industry importance.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWSoftware engineeringSep 2021Dismissed
A software engineer sought EB-2 NIW for Internet of Things research. The AAO found the proposed endeavor met Dhanasar's first prong with national importance. However, the petitioner failed the second prong: academic credentials and published research were insufficient to demonstrate he was well positioned to advance the endeavor.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalSep 2021Dismissed
A nurse with advanced training and teaching experience sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. She met the advanced degree requirement but failed the NIW test because her proposed work lacked demonstrated national importance and specific prospective impact beyond local patient care and student education.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AISep 2021Remanded
IT systems manager seeks NIW for IT project management and systems analysis services. AAO remanded, finding Director did not adequately explain deficiencies in evidence supporting national importance and prematurely addressed second prong without properly establishing first prong foundation.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementAug 2021Dismissed
A security management specialist sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for a business endeavor. The service center denied the petition, finding no national importance. On appeal, the petitioner raised only general claims of legal error without addressing specific findings, and submitted a post-filing document. The AAO summarily dismissed for failing to identify erroneous conclusions.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOtherAug 2021Dismissed
A petitioner proposed unspecified scientific activity and vendor machine development. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient specificity and clarity regarding substantial merit and national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIAug 2021Dismissed
An information systems manager with advanced degree seeks NIW for EB-2 classification. She claimed her IT consulting and future business intelligence firm would benefit the U.S. economy through job creation and technological advances. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding her proposed work lacks national importance and adequate documentation of prospective economic impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWFinance and economicsAug 2021Dismissed
Accountant sought NIW for EB-2 classification to offer finance and tax consulting to U.S. companies. Petitioner claimed benefits to U.S. economy through business activities. AAO held the proposed endeavor lacks national importance, benefiting only her employer and clients without broader accounting industry or economic implications.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceAug 2021Dismissed
Legal analyst and consultant seeking NIW under EB-2. Claimed substantial merit and national importance for proposed consulting business advising U.S. companies entering Latin American markets. AAO held the endeavor lacks national importance because it would not impact the field broadly, has no demonstrated substantial economic effects, and lacks evidence of significant employment or regional benefit.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIAug 2021Dismissed
IT project manager sought NIW as EB-2 advanced degree professional. AAO found proposed work in security, IT and fire solutions had substantial merit but lacked evidence of national importance or specific prospective impact. Appeal dismissed for failure to meet first prong of Dhanasar.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMechanical and aerospace engineeringAug 2021Dismissed
Maintenance and renovation engineer qualified as advanced degree professional sought national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of proposed maintenance services endeavor under Dhanasar first prong; work did not show broader implications or substantial economic benefits.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMarketing, media, communicationsAug 2021Dismissed
A marketing manager with an advanced degree sought a national interest waiver. The AAO withdrew the service center's favorable first-prong finding, concluding the proposed marketing services lacked national importance because the benefit was limited to employers and clients, with no shown broader or economic impact. Later prongs were not reached and the appeal was dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementAug 2021Dismissed
An HR manager with advanced degree seeks NIW for EB-2. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to articulate specific proposed endeavor beyond general field of HR management; lacks demonstrated national importance for waiver eligibility.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaAug 2021Dismissed
Teacher with advanced degree sought NIW waiver for EB-2 classification to teach English language learners. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar first prong; teacher's work, though meritorious, impacts only specific school, not education field broadly or U.S. economy nationally.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaAug 2021Dismissed
Teacher sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. AAO dismissed: petitioner did not meet three of six exceptional ability criteria and failed underlying classification. Additionally, AAO found petitioner willfully misrepresented authorship of four publications submitted as evidence.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaAug 2021Dismissed
Urban planning researcher with PhD sought NIW for research in sustainable urban planning and environmental justice. AAO affirmed Director's denial: first prong met but second prong failed because petitioner lacked evidence of success, implementation, or influence in the field despite research experience and publications.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalAug 2021Dismissed
A physical therapist sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in physical therapy required for an advanced degree equivalency, making further analysis unnecessary.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalAug 2021Dismissed
A direct care worker seeks EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. The AAO dismissed, finding she failed to meet three of six regulatory criteria for exceptional ability; official academic records lacked required documentation, employment history insufficient, and recognition letters did not demonstrate significant contributions. NIW not addressed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaAug 2021Dismissed
Youth minister seeks NIW as EB-2 advanced degree professional. Claimed substantial merit and national importance of providing youth outreach ministerial services addressing mental health and opioid epidemic. AAO found no national importance; work lacks evidence of significant potential economic effects or broader field impact beyond specific clientele.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWChemistry and materialsAug 2021Dismissed
A postdoctoral fellow in chemical engineering sought EB-2 NIW based on proposed fuel research. The AAO found the endeavor had merit and national importance but dismissed because the petitioner lacked sufficient evidence of being well positioned to advance it, particularly given limited citation impact and no demonstrated primary funding responsibility.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMechanical and aerospace engineeringAug 2021Dismissed
An aerospace engineer sought national interest waiver. AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, but the petitioner failed the second prong because his research lacked demonstrated field impact, his role in funding was unclear, and his work showed no record of progress in advancing space research.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaAug 2021Dismissed
A pharmaceutical chemist and assistant professor sought NIW classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to establish substantial merit and national importance of the proposed endeavor under Dhanasar's first prong because the endeavor remained vague and lacked evidence of broader field impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalAug 2021Dismissed
Registered nurse and nursing instructor applied for NIW under EB-2. Petitioner had advanced degree and proposed work in gerontological nursing and research. AAO found substantial merit but no national importance; nursing work would not impact field broadly, and research plans lacked sufficient detail and evidence of original innovations or wider implications.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceAug 2021Dismissed
Security expert sought NIW for EB-2. Service Center approved advanced degree qualification but denied NIW. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to describe specific proposed endeavor with sufficient detail to establish substantial merit and national importance.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWChemistry and materialsAug 2021Dismissed
Adjunct chemistry instructor sought NIW for EB-2. Petitioner claimed substantial merit and national importance but provided inconsistent information about proposed endeavor. AAO found significant unresolved questions and withdrew director's finding that first prong was met, dismissing appeal without reaching remaining prongs.
0 of 3 criteria metRead →
