Published AAO appeal decisions

A research scientist in chemistry sought extraordinary ability classification. The service center accepted only the scholarly articles criterion. On appeal he claimed three more, covering published material, original contributions and leading role. The AAO dismissed, finding the evidence insufficient for three criteria and not showing sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.

A direct care worker seeks EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. The AAO dismissed, finding she failed to meet three of six regulatory criteria for exceptional ability; official academic records lacked required documentation, employment history insufficient, and recognition letters did not demonstrate significant contributions. NIW not addressed.

Youth minister seeks NIW as EB-2 advanced degree professional. Claimed substantial merit and national importance of providing youth outreach ministerial services addressing mental health and opioid epidemic. AAO found no national importance; work lacks evidence of significant potential economic effects or broader field impact beyond specific clientele.

A postdoctoral fellow in chemical engineering sought EB-2 NIW based on proposed fuel research. The AAO found the endeavor had merit and national importance but dismissed because the petitioner lacked sufficient evidence of being well positioned to advance it, particularly given limited citation impact and no demonstrated primary funding responsibility.

Fish market petitioner seeks extraordinary ability classification for beneficiary in business. Appeal dismissed summarily because petitioner failed to identify any erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the service center's denial and did not contest any aspect of the decision.

An aerospace engineer sought national interest waiver. AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, but the petitioner failed the second prong because his research lacked demonstrated field impact, his role in funding was unclear, and his work showed no record of progress in advancing space research.

A pharmaceutical chemist and assistant professor sought NIW classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to establish substantial merit and national importance of the proposed endeavor under Dhanasar's first prong because the endeavor remained vague and lacked evidence of broader field impact.

Registered nurse and nursing instructor applied for NIW under EB-2. Petitioner had advanced degree and proposed work in gerontological nursing and research. AAO found substantial merit but no national importance; nursing work would not impact field broadly, and research plans lacked sufficient detail and evidence of original innovations or wider implications.

Security expert sought NIW for EB-2. Service Center approved advanced degree qualification but denied NIW. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to describe specific proposed endeavor with sufficient detail to establish substantial merit and national importance.

Adjunct chemistry instructor sought NIW for EB-2. Petitioner claimed substantial merit and national importance but provided inconsistent information about proposed endeavor. AAO found significant unresolved questions and withdrew director's finding that first prong was met, dismissing appeal without reaching remaining prongs.

A petroleum engineer seeking NIW claimed ability to advance research on artificial lift technology. The AAO found the proposed endeavor met the first Dhanasar prong but dismissed the appeal because the engineer's publications, citations, education, and journal service did not demonstrate he was well positioned to advance the specific research.

A counterterrorism security expert with a master's degree sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. While qualified as an advanced degree holder, he failed to demonstrate that his proposed security or emergency management work had national importance or sufficient prospective impact, lacking specific details about his endeavor.

Software developer with ten years experience seeks NIW for independent software development and possible game company. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed work lacks national importance beyond prospective employers and clients, and applicant lacks demonstrated success or concrete plan to advance the endeavor.

Dentist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Qualified as advanced degree professional but failed Dhanasar test: proposed dental work benefited only immediate patients and employer, lacking broader implications for U.S. workers or substantial economic effects required for national importance.

Taekwondo athlete and coach claiming NIW under EB-2. Petitioner asserted exceptional ability under multiple criteria; Director found only one met. On appeal, insufficient arguments and evidence to overcome exceptional ability finding. NIW claim failed at first Dhanasar prong: proposed endeavor lacks national importance. Appeal dismissed.

A dentist and orthodontist with MBA sought NIW for EB-2. AAO dismissed because petitioner lacked a U.S. DDS/DMD or foreign equivalent degree required by regulation, and proposed dental practice lacks national importance under Dhanasar.

Gastroenterologist sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. Petitioner established substantial merit and national importance of proposed research endeavor but failed to demonstrate he was well positioned to advance it through sufficient record of success, impact, or progress. Appeal dismissed.

A country club filed a motion to reopen and reconsider an O-1A denial for a tennis director. The AAO dismissed both motions for failure to meet procedural requirements: the motion lacked required statement about prior judicial proceedings and did not present proper cause, making merits review unnecessary.

Industrial chemist seeking NIW for research on chemical applications. First prong met but second prong failed because patent and publications, though recognized, did not demonstrate sufficient industry impact or record of success needed to show petitioner well positioned to advance research endeavor.

Biochemistry researcher sought NIW for EB-2 classification for brain tumor research. Petitioner demonstrated substantial merit and national importance of proposed research, strong qualifications to advance it, and past successful contributions. AAO held all three Dhanasar prongs met and waiver merited.

Education specialist sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the proposed endeavor of professionalizing teachers lacked sufficient specificity and documentation to meet the first prong of Dhanasar framework requiring substantial merit and national importance. AAO also found willful material misrepresentation regarding professional research experience.

An electrical engineer sought extraordinary ability classification after the service center revoked an earlier approval. On appeal, the petitioner submitted an affidavit and letter about the lengthy procedural history and stress, but no substantive response to the revocation grounds. The AAO summarily dismissed the appeal for failing to identify any specific error of law or fact.

Senior application engineer and researcher with advanced degree in electrical engineering sought NIW for EB-2. AAO found beneficiary qualified for EB-2 but dismissed appeal because proposed endeavor lacked sufficient national importance beyond the specific employer.

An ICT consultant and professor sought NIW under EB-2. The AAO found the proposed endeavor lacked national importance, as the regulatory record did not show impact beyond individual clients and students; benefits did not rise to substantial positive economic effects. Appeal dismissed.