Published AAO appeal decisions

Clinical psychologist and entrepreneur proposing mental health services business claims national importance waiver. AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance because the endeavor lacks broader field implications, significant job creation, or substantial economic effects beyond direct patients, failing Dhanasar's first prong.

A medical science liaison proposing a new medical consulting and training business sought a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance due to insufficient documentation of prospective impact and benefits limited to the business and clients rather than broader healthcare industry.

AI/ML software engineer sought EB-2 national interest waiver for on-device machine learning development. AAO found substantial merit but no national importance. Letters claiming critical role insufficient without corroborating evidence of broader field implications or economic effects. Second and third Dhanasar prongs not reached.

Civil engineer sought EB-2 NIW for concrete innovation solutions in wet areas and flood zones. SCOPS found national importance but AAO disagreed and reserved that issue. Appeal dismissed because petitioner failed second prong: bachelor's degree insufficient, unsupported conclusory letters, no demonstrated partnerships or customer interest.

Entrepreneur seeking EB-2 NIW for business exporting supply chain products. AAO dismissed appeal, finding substantial merit but not national importance. Petitioner failed to demonstrate specific prospective impact beyond her company and customers; reliance on sector importance and general statistics insufficient without corroborating evidence of substantial economic effects.

Applied mathematician with doctorate proposed algorithm optimization for medical devices. Possessed substantial merit but failed to establish national importance of specific endeavor. Evidence about medical devices industry and general STEM field importance insufficient without showing direct national impact. Appeal dismissed.

Information technology researcher with advanced degree sought NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor has national importance but petitioner lacks relevant expertise, clear research plan, and demonstrated funding success needed to be well-positioned to advance it.

A Ph.D. software engineering student sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The petitioner claimed three exceptional ability criteria. The AAO found the petitioner met one criterion but withdrew a prior favorable determination on professional membership, leaving the petitioner unable to satisfy all three claimed criteria. Appeal dismissed without reaching the national interest waiver analysis.

Postdoctoral candidate in electrical engineering with Master's degree sought EB-2 NIW for research in machine learning applications. AAO affirmed Service Center denial, finding endeavor has national importance but petitioner is not well positioned to advance it, lacking sufficient evidence of field influence or relevant party interest.

Artist with master's degree sought EB-2 NIW to expand artistic presence in U.S. SCOPS found substantial merit but not national importance. AAO affirmed: endeavor lacks sufficient national importance and broader implications required under Dhanasar framework. Appeal dismissed.

Mental health hospital petitions for EB-2 NIW on behalf of rehabilitation therapist providing art therapy to forensically committed patients. Beneficiary qualifies as advanced degree professional but proposed endeavor lacks national importance; job duties would not impact therapeutic field broadly at national level.

A financial planning consultant sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a consulting company serving small and medium-sized enterprises. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance because he did not show his individual company would reach the level of national-level economic impact required by Dhanasar.

Project management specialist with advanced degree sought NIW for a consulting initiative providing training and mentorship to rural entrepreneurs in Florida. AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor, while having substantial merit, lacks the national importance required by the first prong of the Dhanasar framework; general economic benefits and job creation potential are insufficient.

Graduate research assistant in cybersecurity self-petitions for EB-2 NIW. Proposes autonomous vehicle security research with substantial merit and national importance. AAO finds insufficient evidence of deployment impact, citation comparisons, or progress rendering her well positioned to advance the endeavor.

Environmental engineering analyst sought EB-2 NIW for digital platform using hyperspectral imagery and machine learning for environmental data. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance; speculative economic benefits and sole self-employment insufficient.

Information security analyst sought EB-2 NIW for developing unified cybersecurity framework integrating DLP, IRM, and AI. AAO found endeavor lacked national importance despite alignment with executive orders on cybersecurity and AI. Consultancy work lacks sufficient broader field impact. Appeal dismissed.

An aerospace engineer with a Ph.D. seeking EB-2 with NIW for fatigue/damage tolerance research demonstrated the first Dhanasar prong but failed the second, lacking evidence his work influenced the field or represented record of success in advancing the endeavor.

Quantitative analyst with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver. SCOPS found petitioner qualified for underlying classification but denied waiver. AAO affirmed, finding petitioner presented inconsistent and changing proposed endeavors, preventing determination of national importance under Dhanasar first prong. Remaining prongs reserved.

Senior reliability engineer with Ph.D. in mechanical engineering sought NIW for continued work in consumer electronics hardware reliability testing. AAO found work lacked national importance; specific endeavor did not have broader implications beyond assigned hardware modules despite field importance.

Software engineer with master's degree proposing to develop open-source web components library for data visualization. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar first prong; general STEM field importance insufficient without demonstrated broad impact.

Structural engineer consultant seeks EB-2 with national interest waiver. Petitioner holds advanced degree and meets substantial merit requirement. However, proposed endeavor lacks national importance because partnerships undefined, events unspecified, and projected creation of twenty jobs insufficient. Proposed business does not demonstrate broader field impact or substantial economic effects. First Dhanasar prong not satisfied; appeal dismissed.

General manager seeking EB-2 NIW for business consulting services claimed company importance to U.S. business ecosystem. AAO dismissed, finding no sufficient evidence that proposed endeavor would impact business consulting field broadly or generate substantial positive economic effects at national level.

Quantitative finance analyst self-petitioner sought EB-2 NIW. Claimed substantial merit and national importance of financial risk modeling work. AAO affirmed denial, finding no demonstrated national importance of the specific proposed endeavor despite industry importance; opinion letters lacked sufficient specificity.

An IT program manager seeking EB-2 classification and NIW claimed exceptional ability and national importance for proposed IT project management business. AAO found he failed to meet three evidentiary criteria for exceptional ability and that his proposed endeavor lacked national importance beyond his company and clients, thus denying the NIW.

A postdoctoral researcher in metabolic diseases sought an EB-2 national interest waiver. She satisfied the first prong (substantial merit and national importance) but failed the second: she lacked a clear plan, institutional commitment, or funding evidence to demonstrate she was well-positioned to advance her work, so the appeal was dismissed.