Published AAO appeal decisions

Pharmacist seeking NIW for advanced-degree EB-2. Claimed telepharmacy and medication delivery innovation endeavor demonstrates substantial merit addressing health disparities. AAO found substantial merit established but rejected national importance of petitioner's specific endeavor versus general field importance. Appeal dismissed.

A dentist seeking EB-2 NIW as entrepreneur failed to establish five years progressive post-baccalaureate experience through employer letters and failed to submit required labor certification form. Appeal dismissed on independent alternative grounds without reaching NIW analysis.

A physical therapist sought EB-2 NIW. Qualified for underlying EB-2 as advanced degree professional. Claimed innovative rehabilitation methods and insoles but lacked objective documentation. Specific endeavor lacks national importance; general patient care does not reach necessary impact level.

Construction estimator seeking EB-2 NIW claimed proposed construction firm would address infrastructure and affordable housing. AAO held the specific endeavor lacks national importance because the record does not establish substantial positive economic effects beyond the petitioner's company and clients.

A musician sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The petitioner claimed exceptional ability but failed to meet three of six regulatory criteria. The AAO found membership in Brazilian Musicians Association insufficient and contributions limited to personal performing and one education tool, lacking field-wide impact.

A mechanical engineer seeks EB-2 national interest waiver to work as construction manager in oil and gas sector. The AAO found substantial merit but no national importance, as the work lacks prospective impact beyond the employer and clients to broader industry implications.

Risk management advisor in occupational health and safety sought EB-2 NIW. Service center found advanced degree qualification but denied waiver. AAO affirmed: proposed endeavor of providing consulting services lacked national importance under Dhanasar's first prong because benefits would not extend beyond her employer and clientele to impact the field broadly.

A personal financial advisor sought EB-2 with national interest waiver under Dhanasar framework. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the petitioner failed to establish substantial merit and national importance of the proposed endeavor, offering only generalized assertions about attracting investment and supporting clients without showing broader field or national impact.

Physician-researcher in urologic oncology with advanced degree seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. Claimed three Dhanasar prongs: substantial merit of clinical and research endeavor, personal positioning to advance it, and balance favoring waiver. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three prongs met based on clinical care contributions, research trajectory, and public health significance.

Self-employed photographer sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner met only one of six exceptional ability criteria (academic degree), failing to establish three required criteria. Because underlying EB-2 qualification not established, Dhanasar waiver analysis not reached.

Marketing manager sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner's inconsistent statements about the proposed endeavor prevented evaluation of its substantial merit or national importance under Dhanasar framework.

An entrepreneur without demonstrated advanced degree equivalent sought EB-2 classification as general operations manager for soccer club or events business. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to establish EB-2 eligibility and therefore could not qualify for NIW, without reaching Dhanasar prongs.

Sales representative with advanced degree seeks NIW. Petitioner resubmitted RFE response without addressing Director's grounds for denial. Appeal summarily dismissed under procedural rule because petitioner failed to identify specific erroneous conclusions of law or fact.

Software developer sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Claimed software engineering work for US company had substantial merit and national importance. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked specificity and national importance; no prospective impact beyond employer and clients; first prong of Dhanasar failed.

Human resources specialist sought NIW for EB-2 classification. She claimed her proposed HR consulting work had national importance via business plan and industry reports. AAO held the endeavor lacked national importance because her work would benefit only specific clients and employers, not the HR field or economy broadly.

A self-petitioner researcher in geospatial information management sought an NIW as an advanced degree professional. The AAO affirmed denial, finding she demonstrated substantial merit and was well-positioned but failed to establish the national importance of her proposed research as required by Dhanasar's first prong.

A nurse sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed that she lacked an advanced degree equivalent and failed to establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience. As she did not qualify for the underlying EB-2 classification, the Dhanasar analysis was not reached.

A pilot sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO found the petitioner failed to meet evidentiary criteria for exceptional ability or advanced degree professional status, lacking sufficient documentation from employers and relevant credentials, and therefore was ineligible for the underlying classification and waiver.

An entrepreneur seeking EB-2 classification with national interest waiver claimed to work in oil and gas consulting. The AAO found the petitioner failed the first Dhanasar prong by providing vague, contradictory descriptions of the proposed endeavor without establishing its specific national importance.

A software engineer with ten years of experience sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for work in cloud security and big data analytics. The AAO affirmed denial, finding his proposed endeavor lacked national importance because he provided no specific evidence of prospective impact extending beyond his own company or immediate clients to the broader industry or economy.

Medical scientist seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Claimed proposed endeavor to bridge Korean and U.S. medical systems had substantial merit and national importance, and that he was well positioned to advance it. AAO found the endeavor lacked specificity, techniques were not clearly identified or proven superior to existing U.S. offerings, and no demonstrated partnerships or interest from relevant institutions.

Supply chain management specialist seeking EB-2 advanced degree with national interest waiver. Claimed supply chain expertise for pharmaceutical companies had national importance and he was well positioned to advance it. AAO found petitioner confused industry importance with specific endeavor importance; no evidence of impact beyond particular employers or substantial economic effects for nation.

A human resources manager sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for consulting work through her company. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked demonstrated national importance; insufficient evidence of potential to employ workers or produce substantial positive economic effects.

A pilot seeking EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW failed to submit required labor certification and did not clearly specify whether seeking classification as advanced degree professional or exceptional ability individual. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner did not establish EB-2 eligibility or merit for NIW under Dhanasar framework.

An entrepreneur in supply chain management with an advanced degree seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO found the petitioner qualified as advanced degree holder but failed the first Dhanasar prong. While the endeavor showed substantial merit, the petitioner lacked evidence of national importance beyond her own business operations.