Published AAO appeal decisions

Chief executive officer and solutions architect claimed four criteria including membership, published material, leading role, and high salary. AAO found none met. YPO membership lacked demonstrated outstanding achievement standard. Published materials insufficient in prominence or attribution. Executive experience alone does not establish upper echelon status required.

A robotics engineer proposed establishing a U.S.-based company providing remote-control services and consulting. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to establish that the proposed endeavor has national importance; generic field information and personal intentions do not demonstrate projected impact rising to substantial positive economic effects.

Information technology director seeking EB-2 advanced degree or exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner failed to establish foreign education equivalent to U.S. bachelor's degree and did not meet three criteria for exceptional ability. National importance of proposed endeavor also not established under Dhanasar framework.

Research associate in physics seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met three of ten initial evidentiary criteria including judging and scholarly articles. AAO held evidence insufficient for final merits determination; routine research activities and limited recognition do not establish sustained acclaim or top-tier status required for extraordinary ability.

Political scientist sought EB-2 national interest waiver after qualifying for advanced degree classification. Director found substantial merit but not national importance. AAO affirmed, holding petitioner failed to demonstrate specific prospective impact of Central Asian affairs research on field or U.S. economy at requisite level.

Application manager seeks NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification. Proposed IT work providing services to organizations with important missions. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance; while petitioner was highly qualified and IT field important, no evidence showed specific proposed endeavor would impact IT field broadly or create substantial economic or employment benefits nationally.

Physical therapist and doula with advanced degree seeking national interest waiver for EB-2. Petitioner claimed endeavor has national importance due to therapist shortage and Brazilian healthcare knowledge. AAO found petitioner submitted industry-level data but failed to demonstrate her specific endeavor would have national importance; individual patient care and business startup lack evidence of broader field impact.

Motion on P-1 nonimmigrant visa petition for boxer. Petitioner sought to reopen appeal of Service Center denial. AAO dismissed motion to reopen and motion to reconsider as lacking new facts addressing distinguished competition and international reputation requirements.

A freight transportation entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The appeal was dismissed because the AAO withdrew the service center's findings on degree, license and membership criteria, since the degree was unrelated and the license and membership post-dated filing. The waiver framework was left unaddressed.

A cleaning-products manufacturer petitioned for its president, seeking an advanced degree classification with a national interest waiver. The service center found the degree qualification met but denied the waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding that national importance of the endeavor was not shown through employment or economic effects, and reserved the other prongs.

A sports coordinator and trainer sought EB-2 with national interest waiver under Dhanasar. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance, despite addressing the important issue of childhood obesity. The petitioner failed to show the work would impact U.S. soccer or public health broadly or generate substantial positive economic effects.

A database engineer with MBA sought NIW for freelance work and founding an online IT school. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance and petitioner was not well positioned to advance the online school despite having relevant experience and business background.

Transportation engineer with bachelor's degree and work experience sought EB-2 with NIW. AAO found he lacked sufficient post-baccalaureate experience for advanced degree classification and his proposed traffic engineering endeavor lacked the national importance required for waiver under Dhanasar.

A company executive was the beneficiary of an O-1 extension petition filed by his employer in the business field. The director denied it over a suspended corporate status and a willful misrepresentation finding. The AAO withdrew the decision and remanded, because the director did not adequately consider the response to the notice of intent to deny.

Former customs official sought NIW for EB-2 classification to establish customs consulting firm and clearance services in United States. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance beyond petitioner's clientele, petitioner lacks entrepreneurial experience despite customs expertise, and therefore waiver not warranted.

A journalism professor proposing an open-access radio content institute for training and broadcasting. AAO held that while substantial merit was established, national importance was not; evidence lacked demonstrable prospective impact on field or broader implications commensurate with national significance.

Professional freestyle wrestler seeks NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification. Proposed competing and coaching for university wrestling club to increase U.S. athletic competitiveness. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite substantial merit; evidence showed petitioner's skills and value but no documentation of prospective impact on sport broadly or significant employment or economic benefits.

A solution director in supply chain and manufacturing technology sought extraordinary ability classification, claiming four criteria. The Director accepted two. The AAO found only judging satisfied, rejected original contributions and leading role, treated scholarly articles as waived, and dismissed because acclaim was confined to employers and collaborators.

Dentist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Petitioner did not establish underlying EB-2 eligibility as advanced degree professional (lacked DDS/DMD equivalent) or exceptional ability (only met two of six criteria). AAO dismissed appeal.

Nurse petitioner self-filed for EB-2 with NIW, proposing to provide expert nursing advice and treatment at a healthcare facility. AAO dismissed: the proposed endeavor lacks national importance because it benefits only the specific employer and patients, not the broader field, and general industry reports about nursing shortages do not address the specific endeavor's national impact.

Chief technology officer seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO remanded because director misclassified petitioner's field of endeavor; petitioner asserted multidisciplinary expertise but director evaluated narrow specialty only, requiring RFE for field clarification before criteria assessment.

A sailing instructor sought extraordinary ability classification, with the director finding neither a major internationally recognized award nor three evidentiary criteria shown. On appeal the petitioner submitted letters but identified no error of law or fact in the denial, so the appeal was summarily dismissed without examining the underlying evidence.

An entrepreneur and researcher in cybersecurity on O-1 visa sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding he satisfied only two of ten criteria and thus failed the initial threshold, with aggregate review showing insufficient acclaim and recognition required for the classification.

Medical researcher in liver transplantation sought EB-2 NIW. Service center found advanced degree qualification but denied waiver. AAO found proposed research had national importance but petitioner was not well positioned to advance it—lacking sufficient publication record, citations, and field recognition to demonstrate success trajectory.