Published AAO appeal decisions

A nurse with advanced training and teaching experience sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. She met the advanced degree requirement but failed the NIW test because her proposed work lacked demonstrated national importance and specific prospective impact beyond local patient care and student education.

IT systems manager seeks NIW for IT project management and systems analysis services. AAO remanded, finding Director did not adequately explain deficiencies in evidence supporting national importance and prematurely addressed second prong without properly establishing first prong foundation.

A security management specialist sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for a business endeavor. The service center denied the petition, finding no national importance. On appeal, the petitioner raised only general claims of legal error without addressing specific findings, and submitted a post-filing document. The AAO summarily dismissed for failing to identify erroneous conclusions.

A petitioner proposed unspecified scientific activity and vendor machine development. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient specificity and clarity regarding substantial merit and national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.

Independent filmmaker from Zimbabwe seeking extraordinary ability classification. Met four initial evidentiary criteria: awards, published material, judging, and artistic display. AAO dismissed on final merits, finding petitioner respected domestically but lacking sustained national or international acclaim and not at very top of field required for classification.

An information systems manager with advanced degree seeks NIW for EB-2 classification. She claimed her IT consulting and future business intelligence firm would benefit the U.S. economy through job creation and technological advances. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding her proposed work lacks national importance and adequate documentation of prospective economic impact.

Accountant sought NIW for EB-2 classification to offer finance and tax consulting to U.S. companies. Petitioner claimed benefits to U.S. economy through business activities. AAO held the proposed endeavor lacks national importance, benefiting only her employer and clients without broader accounting industry or economic implications.

Biophysicist and CEO seeks extraordinary ability classification. Claimed five criteria; court found four met. AAO conducted final merits determination, finding sustained national and international acclaim through extensive documentation of achievements, citations, patents, and research impact warranting extraordinary ability classification.

A musician, composer, and music producer with five solo albums and international touring sought EB-1A classification. The AAO found he satisfied four criteria: prizes, published material, judging, and commercial success. In final merits, the AAO sustained the appeal, finding sustained national and international acclaim and recognition as top-tier collaborator demonstrating extraordinary ability.

Legal analyst and consultant seeking NIW under EB-2. Claimed substantial merit and national importance for proposed consulting business advising U.S. companies entering Latin American markets. AAO held the endeavor lacks national importance because it would not impact the field broadly, has no demonstrated substantial economic effects, and lacks evidence of significant employment or regional benefit.

IT project manager sought NIW as EB-2 advanced degree professional. AAO found proposed work in security, IT and fire solutions had substantial merit but lacked evidence of national importance or specific prospective impact. Appeal dismissed for failure to meet first prong of Dhanasar.

Maintenance and renovation engineer qualified as advanced degree professional sought national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of proposed maintenance services endeavor under Dhanasar first prong; work did not show broader implications or substantial economic benefits.

A nephrologist with board certification seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. He claimed three evidentiary criteria: judging, scholarly articles, and critical role. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding he met three initial criteria and demonstrating sustained national acclaim as a leading expert with a career of acclaimed work, qualifying him for extraordinary ability.

A marketing manager with an advanced degree sought a national interest waiver. The AAO withdrew the service center's favorable first-prong finding, concluding the proposed marketing services lacked national importance because the benefit was limited to employers and clients, with no shown broader or economic impact. Later prongs were not reached and the appeal was dismissed.

An HR manager with advanced degree seeks NIW for EB-2. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to articulate specific proposed endeavor beyond general field of HR management; lacks demonstrated national importance for waiver eligibility.

Teacher with advanced degree sought NIW waiver for EB-2 classification to teach English language learners. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar first prong; teacher's work, though meritorious, impacts only specific school, not education field broadly or U.S. economy nationally.

Teacher sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. AAO dismissed: petitioner did not meet three of six exceptional ability criteria and failed underlying classification. Additionally, AAO found petitioner willfully misrepresented authorship of four publications submitted as evidence.

Urban planning researcher with PhD sought NIW for research in sustainable urban planning and environmental justice. AAO affirmed Director's denial: first prong met but second prong failed because petitioner lacked evidence of success, implementation, or influence in the field despite research experience and publications.

A physical therapist sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in physical therapy required for an advanced degree equivalency, making further analysis unnecessary.

Director of photography and cinematographer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner met three evidentiary criteria through awards, published material, and exhibitions. AAO found sustained national and international acclaim, consistent industry recognition since 2008, and achievements reflecting career of acclaimed work among small percentage at field's top.

A research scientist in chemistry sought extraordinary ability classification. The service center accepted only the scholarly articles criterion. On appeal he claimed three more, covering published material, original contributions and leading role. The AAO dismissed, finding the evidence insufficient for three criteria and not showing sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.

A direct care worker seeks EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. The AAO dismissed, finding she failed to meet three of six regulatory criteria for exceptional ability; official academic records lacked required documentation, employment history insufficient, and recognition letters did not demonstrate significant contributions. NIW not addressed.

Youth minister seeks NIW as EB-2 advanced degree professional. Claimed substantial merit and national importance of providing youth outreach ministerial services addressing mental health and opioid epidemic. AAO found no national importance; work lacks evidence of significant potential economic effects or broader field impact beyond specific clientele.

A postdoctoral fellow in chemical engineering sought EB-2 NIW based on proposed fuel research. The AAO found the endeavor had merit and national importance but dismissed because the petitioner lacked sufficient evidence of being well positioned to advance it, particularly given limited citation impact and no demonstrated primary funding responsibility.

Fish market petitioner seeks extraordinary ability classification for beneficiary in business. Appeal dismissed summarily because petitioner failed to identify any erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the service center's denial and did not contest any aspect of the decision.