Published AAO appeal decisions

A management scientist sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver for research-based endeavors in inclusive leadership and workforce adaptability. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial merit and national importance of the specific proposed endeavor under Dhanasar's first prong.

An entrepreneur with advanced degree claims NIW for supply chain logistics consultancy. AAO reversed service center's EB-2 denial on advanced degree grounds but affirmed NIW denial, finding specific endeavor lacks national importance; work for prospective clients lacks regional or national impact.

Logistician and entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW to establish domestic trucking logistics business. AAO dismissed appeal, holding proposed endeavor lacked national importance despite substantial merit; job projections lacked corroboration and scope insufficient for broader industry impact.

An engineer in renewable energy with master's degree in sustainable energy sought NIW for solar energy systems design. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of the proposed endeavor, which lacked sufficient prospective impact on the field or broader economy.

A finance professional self-petitioned for EB-2 NIW as anti-money laundering compliance specialist. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding her proposed endeavor lacks sufficient national importance despite alignment with federal priorities.

Project engineer seeking EB-2 NIW for advanced simulation software development in mechanical engineering. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; impact on field insufficient and not extending beyond employer to justify waiver. Appeal dismissed.

A consultant sought an NIW to operate a consultancy company for small and medium-sized enterprises. Although the AAO found substantial merit and the petitioner well positioned, the endeavor lacked national importance; consulting services for regional businesses did not demonstrate prospective impact of national significance.

A hematology and oncology physician claimed five criteria for extraordinary ability classification. Service center found two met. AAO affirmed that original contributions lacked major significance, critical role evidence was insufficient, and salary data did not support comparison to field. Petitioner did not satisfy the required three-criterion threshold.

PhD holder in AI and infrastructure management, founder of startup, sought EB-2 NIW. Proposed endeavor: lead AI and infrastructure research and consulting. USCIS found substantial merit but insufficient evidence of national importance. AAO affirmed: endeavor lacks specificity, funding details, and demonstrated broader impact; appeal dismissed.

Computer software engineer proposing manufacturing software company claiming STEM field status and broader implications for intelligent manufacturing. AAO held proposed endeavor fails national importance: business plan lacks credible location and employment data, financial projections unsubstantiated, no demonstrated broader implications beyond general industry importance.

Engineering graduate student self-petitioner sought NIW for AI research using linguistics and game theory. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked specific details and documented prospective impact required to establish national importance under Dhanasar first prong.

Data scientist self-petitioner sought EB-2 NIW based on advanced degree and proposed research in anomaly detection. AAO affirmed denial, holding petitioner did not establish national importance under first Dhanasar prong; research projects lacked specificity and documentation showing broader field or industry impact. Second and third prongs not addressed.

A pilot with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver for employment in pilot training and aviation. AAO affirmed denial, finding his proposed endeavor lacked national importance; being in an important industry or STEM field is insufficient without demonstrating the specific endeavor's broader prospective impact.

Registered professional engineer with MBA and metallurgical engineering degree seeks EB-2 national interest waiver in energy sector. Petitioner claimed endeavor advancing sustainable energy and strategic planning serves national interests. AAO held first Dhanasar prong unmet: proposed endeavor inadequately described, too vague; expertise above-average insufficient; general field importance does not establish specific endeavor's national importance.

Software development manager seeks NIW for EB-2 classification. Petitioner claimed endeavor has national importance for digital key management solutions in storage and government sectors. AAO dismissed appeal, finding endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance because impact is limited to employer and clients, not the broader storage industry or field.

Computer science researcher with master's degree seeking NIW for autonomous vehicle research. Claimed endeavor has national importance aligned with road safety and energy efficiency. AAO held specific proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite field alignment; expert letters and publications insufficient to demonstrate broader implications or reliance by other researchers.

Senior scientist in translational medicine with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for research on novel therapies and diagnostics. AAO reversed denial on first prong but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish being well-positioned to advance the endeavor.

A research scientist with a Ph.D. sought NIW to develop AI optimization algorithms for large language models and computer vision. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance; benefits appeared limited to the employer without broader field implications.

Civil engineer specializing in highway design and BIM/3D modeling seeks NIW for EB-2. AAO dismissed appeal, holding specific proposed endeavor lacks national importance; expertise in already-adopted technology and general field importance do not establish national importance.

An entrepreneur and CEO qualified for EB-2 with advanced degree but sought national interest waiver for her proposed venture capital consulting firm. AAO found the endeavor lacked specificity, corroboration, and sufficient evidence of national importance, rejecting claims of employment potential and economic impact under Dhanasar.

A mechanical engineer with an advanced degree sought an NIW for a proposed endeavor in ultrasonic guided-wave damage detection for infrastructure. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to establish national importance of the specific endeavor despite its STEM and emerging-technology focus.

A traditional Uzbek jeweler met two criteria on appeal but failed to establish the required three. Membership claims contained inconsistent documentation and conflicting dates; published material appeared in non-qualifying sources or after the deadline; original contributions lacked documentation of major significance.

Immigration attorney seeking NIW to provide visa guidance to foreign nationals. Claimed endeavor advances U.S. talent attraction priorities. AAO dismissed, finding specific proposed work lacked national importance; it would benefit individual clients without demonstrating prospective impact on immigration field or economy broadly.

An urban and regional planning researcher sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance, as it did not demonstrate novel innovation or broader field-wide impact comparable to Dhanasar examples. The first NIW prong failed, and remaining prongs were not reached; the appeal was dismissed.

A business analyst sought EB-2 NIW to establish an AI cybersecurity business as CEO and software developer. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks demonstrated national importance; alignment with government cybersecurity priorities does not establish the specific endeavor's national significance.