Outcome: Dismissed
APR122021_02B2203
Our summary
A mountaineering guide and expedition leader sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification, claiming five criteria. AAO affirmed two criteria were met but rejected membership and declined to reach other criteria. Because petitioner satisfied only two of ten required criteria and lacked sustained national or international acclaim, appeal was dismissed.
Official PDF
The official PDF link for this decision is being verified.
Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Awards · Director determined petitioner satisfied awards criterion; AAO did not disturb this finding
- Judging · Director determined petitioner met judging criterion; AAO did not disturb this finding
What was missing
- Membership · Petitioner failed to show membership requires outstanding achievement as essential condition
- Final merits · Petitioner failed to meet three of ten criteria; record lacks national or international acclaim
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director determined petitioner satisfied awards criterion; AAO did not disturb this finding | |
| Met | Director determined petitioner met judging criterion; AAO did not disturb this finding | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to show membership requires outstanding achievement as essential condition | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to meet three of ten criteria; record lacks national or international acclaim |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
