Outcome: Dismissed
APR282026_03B2203
Our summary
An AI investment bank petitioned for its founder, a technology entrepreneur, claiming extraordinary ability under EB-1A. The beneficiary claimed seven criteria. The AAO found venture capital funding is not an award for excellence and Forbes Technology Council membership does not require outstanding achievement judged by experts, dismissing the appeal.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Venture capital funding is not a prize or award for excellence; comparable evidence rejected.
- Membership · Forbes Technology Council does not require outstanding achievements judged by experts; membership does not satisfy criterion.
- Final merits · Beneficiary has not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim required for EB-1A.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Venture capital funding is not a prize or award for excellence; comparable evidence rejected. | |
| Not met | Forbes Technology Council does not require outstanding achievements judged by experts; membership does not satisfy criterion. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision. | |
| Not met | Beneficiary has not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim required for EB-1A. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
