Outcome: Dismissed
DEC102019_02B2203
Our summary
A violinist claimed five criteria: judging and exhibitions met; awards, scholarly articles, and leading role rejected or unmet. Only two of three required criteria established. AAO dismissed appeal, finding insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Performance programs for concerts and recitals satisfy display criterion
- Judging · Participated as judge at International Music Competition
What was missing
- Awards · Competition lacked entrance requirements, restrictions, competitor numbers, and national or international recognition evidence
- Leading or critical role · Principal Violin II position and board membership do not establish distinguished organizational reputation
- Scholarly articles · Articles in La Musica and Mom & I lacked audience of learned persons in music field
- Final merits · Only two criteria met; three required. Record lacks evidence of sustained national or international acclaim
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Performance programs for concerts and recitals satisfy display criterion | |
| Met | Participated as judge at International Music Competition | |
| Not met | Competition lacked entrance requirements, restrictions, competitor numbers, and national or international recognition evidence | |
| Not met | Principal Violin II position and board membership do not establish distinguished organizational reputation | |
| Not met | Articles in La Musica and Mom & I lacked audience of learned persons in music field | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Not met | Only two criteria met; three required. Record lacks evidence of sustained national or international acclaim |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
