EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsIndividualDecided July 2020Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
JUL142020_02B2203
AwardsNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
A pianist claimed three additional criteria for extraordinary ability. The AAO rejected the service center's findings on awards and published material, finding no national recognition. Original contributions proved unsubstantiated. With fewer than three qualifying criteria, petition failed. Appeal dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Municipal competition prizes lack national or international recognition in field
- Original contributions · Letters from colleagues insufficient to show major significance beyond collaborative circle
- Published material · Publications lack status as professional or major trade outlets; online reach insufficient
- Final merits · Overall record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | Municipal competition prizes lack national or international recognition in field |
 Original contributions | Not met | Letters from colleagues insufficient to show major significance beyond collaborative circle |
 Published material | Not met | Publications lack status as professional or major trade outlets; online reach insufficient |
 Final merits | Not met | Overall record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.