Outcome: Dismissed
APR162021_02B2203
Our summary
Collaborative pianist enrolled in doctoral program claims EB-1A extraordinary ability. Director found two criteria met; petitioner appealed claiming two additional criteria. AAO rejected both new claims. With only two criteria met, petitioner failed initial evidence requirement. Appeal dismissed.
Official PDF
The official PDF link for this decision is being verified.
Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Director found met; AAO did not disturb this conclusion
What was missing
- Leading or critical role · One-night appearance and regular accompanist roles do not constitute critical role; organizations lack distinguished reputation
- Original contributions · Praise for abilities does not establish major significance; no identifiable impact beyond performances
- Final merits · Record does not support sustained national or international acclaim or top percentage of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found met; AAO did not disturb this conclusion | |
| Not met | One-night appearance and regular accompanist roles do not constitute critical role; organizations lack distinguished reputation | |
| Not met | Praise for abilities does not establish major significance; no identifiable impact beyond performances | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed initially but abandoned on appeal; not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed initially but abandoned on appeal; not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed initially but abandoned on appeal; not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed initially but abandoned on appeal; not analyzed | |
| Not met | Record does not support sustained national or international acclaim or top percentage of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
