Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsIndividualDecided April 2021Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

APR162021_02B2203

JudgingMetLeading or critical roleNot metOriginal contributionsNot metAwardsClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Collaborative pianist enrolled in doctoral program claims EB-1A extraordinary ability. Director found two criteria met; petitioner appealed claiming two additional criteria. AAO rejected both new claims. With only two criteria met, petitioner failed initial evidence requirement. Appeal dismissed.

Official PDF

The official PDF link for this decision is being verified.

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · Director found met; AAO did not disturb this conclusion

What was missing

  • Leading or critical role · One-night appearance and regular accompanist roles do not constitute critical role; organizations lack distinguished reputation
  • Original contributions · Praise for abilities does not establish major significance; no identifiable impact beyond performances
  • Final merits · Record does not support sustained national or international acclaim or top percentage of field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetDirector found met; AAO did not disturb this conclusion
Leading or critical roleNot metOne-night appearance and regular accompanist roles do not constitute critical role; organizations lack distinguished reputation
Original contributionsNot metPraise for abilities does not establish major significance; no identifiable impact beyond performances
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed initially but abandoned on appeal; not analyzed
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed initially but abandoned on appeal; not analyzed
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedClaimed initially but abandoned on appeal; not analyzed
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed initially but abandoned on appeal; not analyzed
Final meritsNot metRecord does not support sustained national or international acclaim or top percentage of field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.