EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsIndividualDecided December 2024Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
DEC102024_02B2203
AwardsNot metExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
A Russian-trained musician seeks EB-1A classification for extraordinary ability. He claimed five criteria but only addressed awards on appeal. The AAO found he failed to satisfy three of ten criteria and lacks sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Event access passes do not qualify as nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence.
- Final merits · Record does not support sustained national or international acclaim or place at top of field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | Event access passes do not qualify as nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence. |
 Exhibitions | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; waived on appeal. |
 Judging | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; waived on appeal. |
 Membership | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; waived on appeal. |
 Original contributions | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; waived on appeal. |
 Final merits | Not met | Record does not support sustained national or international acclaim or place at top of field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.