Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ALaw, policy, social scienceIndividualDecided February 2025Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

FEB052025_01B2203

AwardsNot metHigh salaryNot metLeading or critical roleNot metMembershipNot metPublished materialNot metOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzed

Our summary

Lawyer and legal entrepreneur self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed six criteria including awards, membership, publications, contributions, roles, and salary. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner met none of the criteria; director's analysis was thorough and unanswered on appeal.

Official PDF

The official PDF link for this decision is being verified.

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Petitioner acknowledged recognitions not on national or international scale
  • High salary · Insufficient corroborating evidence; no additional documentation submitted on appeal
  • Leading or critical role · Brief discussion of roles does not address evidentiary deficiencies identified by director
  • Membership · Bar association memberships do not require outstanding achievements of members
  • Published material · Articles lacked identified authors; URLs alone do not establish major media publication

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metPetitioner acknowledged recognitions not on national or international scale
High salaryNot metInsufficient corroborating evidence; no additional documentation submitted on appeal
Leading or critical roleNot metBrief discussion of roles does not address evidentiary deficiencies identified by director
MembershipNot metBar association memberships do not require outstanding achievements of members
Published materialNot metArticles lacked identified authors; URLs alone do not establish major media publication
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed with sufficient evidentiary response

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.