Outcome: Dismissed
FEB052025_01B2203
Our summary
Lawyer and legal entrepreneur self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed six criteria including awards, membership, publications, contributions, roles, and salary. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner met none of the criteria; director's analysis was thorough and unanswered on appeal.
Official PDF
The official PDF link for this decision is being verified.
Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Petitioner acknowledged recognitions not on national or international scale
- High salary · Insufficient corroborating evidence; no additional documentation submitted on appeal
- Leading or critical role · Brief discussion of roles does not address evidentiary deficiencies identified by director
- Membership · Bar association memberships do not require outstanding achievements of members
- Published material · Articles lacked identified authors; URLs alone do not establish major media publication
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Petitioner acknowledged recognitions not on national or international scale | |
| Not met | Insufficient corroborating evidence; no additional documentation submitted on appeal | |
| Not met | Brief discussion of roles does not address evidentiary deficiencies identified by director | |
| Not met | Bar association memberships do not require outstanding achievements of members | |
| Not met | Articles lacked identified authors; URLs alone do not establish major media publication | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed with sufficient evidentiary response |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
