Outcome: Dismissed
FEB232023_01B2203
Our summary
A Thai musician and musical instrument maker claimed extraordinary ability. The AAO found one criterion met: artistic display. Five other claimed criteria failed due to insufficient documentation of recognition level and national or international acclaim. The petitioner lacked evidence of sustained recognition in the field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Evidence of artistic display of handmade instruments accepted
What was missing
- Awards · Prizes lack documentation of national or international recognition
- Judging · No evidence of participation as judge of others' work
- Leading or critical role · Television appearances lack evidence of recognized status or acclaim
- Published material · Publication venue not established as major media or professional outlet
- Final merits · Lacks sustained national or international acclaim; evidence from close associates insufficient
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Evidence of artistic display of handmade instruments accepted | |
| Not met | Prizes lack documentation of national or international recognition | |
| Not met | No evidence of participation as judge of others' work | |
| Not met | Television appearances lack evidence of recognized status or acclaim | |
| Not met | Publication venue not established as major media or professional outlet | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Not met | Lacks sustained national or international acclaim; evidence from close associates insufficient |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
