Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ALaw, policy, social scienceIndividualDecided January 2025Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JAN082025_04B2203

High salaryNot metLeading or critical roleNot metMembershipNot metOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Egyptian lawyer claims extraordinary ability under four criteria: membership, leading role, high salary, and original contributions. AAO affirmed denial. Membership in bar association was mandatory for all practitioners, not selective. Leading role claims lacked evidence of distinguished organizations. Salary evidence insufficient for comparative analysis. No sustained international acclaim demonstrated.

Official PDF

The official PDF link for this decision is being verified.

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • High salary · Evidence does not permit appropriate comparison of remuneration to others in the field
  • Leading or critical role · Petitioner did not establish distinguished reputation of relevant organizations or provide sufficient new evidence
  • Membership · Egyptian Bar Association membership mandatory for all practicing lawyers, not selective based on outstanding achievement
  • Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at top

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
High salaryNot metEvidence does not permit appropriate comparison of remuneration to others in the field
Leading or critical roleNot metPetitioner did not establish distinguished reputation of relevant organizations or provide sufficient new evidence
MembershipNot metEgyptian Bar Association membership mandatory for all practicing lawyers, not selective based on outstanding achievement
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; decision focused on three other criteria
Final meritsNot metRecord does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at top

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.