Outcome: Dismissed
JAN082025_04B2203
Our summary
Egyptian lawyer claims extraordinary ability under four criteria: membership, leading role, high salary, and original contributions. AAO affirmed denial. Membership in bar association was mandatory for all practitioners, not selective. Leading role claims lacked evidence of distinguished organizations. Salary evidence insufficient for comparative analysis. No sustained international acclaim demonstrated.
Official PDF
The official PDF link for this decision is being verified.
Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- High salary · Evidence does not permit appropriate comparison of remuneration to others in the field
- Leading or critical role · Petitioner did not establish distinguished reputation of relevant organizations or provide sufficient new evidence
- Membership · Egyptian Bar Association membership mandatory for all practicing lawyers, not selective based on outstanding achievement
- Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at top
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Evidence does not permit appropriate comparison of remuneration to others in the field | |
| Not met | Petitioner did not establish distinguished reputation of relevant organizations or provide sufficient new evidence | |
| Not met | Egyptian Bar Association membership mandatory for all practicing lawyers, not selective based on outstanding achievement | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; decision focused on three other criteria | |
| Not met | Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at top |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
