Outcome: Dismissed
MAR032022_01B2203
Our summary
Financial specialist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner met only one of ten evidentiary criteria (leading role) and failed to establish three required criteria. Evidence lacked specificity about major significance of contributions and did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Leading or critical role · Director determined petitioner fulfilled leading or critical role criterion
What was missing
- Judging · Recruitment and hiring activities are not tantamount to judging work of others in the field
- Membership · Participation on industry roundtables did not demonstrate membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts
- Original contributions · Recommendation letters lacked specificity about major significance; contributions not shown to impact field broadly
- Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director determined petitioner fulfilled leading or critical role criterion | |
| Not met | Recruitment and hiring activities are not tantamount to judging work of others in the field | |
| Not met | Participation on industry roundtables did not demonstrate membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts | |
| Not met | Recommendation letters lacked specificity about major significance; contributions not shown to impact field broadly | |
| Not met | Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
