Outcome: Dismissed
JUL222026_06B2203
Our summary
An occupational health and safety specialist appealed denial of EB-1A classification. The petitioner met criteria for judging and scholarly articles but failed to establish other claimed criteria. The AAO affirmed that the totality of evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the top of the field, dismissing the appeal.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Petitioner met criterion for participation as judge of others' work
- Scholarly articles · Petitioner met criterion for authorship of scholarly articles
What was missing
- High salary · AAO withdrew service center's favorable determination
- Leading or critical role · AAO withdrew service center's favorable determination
- Membership · Associations did not require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized experts
- Final merits · Record insufficient to show sustained national or international acclaim at top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Petitioner met criterion for participation as judge of others' work | |
| Met | Petitioner met criterion for authorship of scholarly articles | |
| Not met | AAO withdrew service center's favorable determination | |
| Not met | AAO withdrew service center's favorable determination | |
| Not met | Associations did not require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized experts | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not discussed; claim waived on appeal | |
| Not met | Record insufficient to show sustained national or international acclaim at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
