EB-1ABusiness and managementIndividualDecided June 2025Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
JUN202025_02B2203
High salaryNot metMembershipNot metOriginal contributionsNot met
Our summary
Business consultant and executive self-petitioner claimed three EB-1A criteria. AAO dismissed motion to reopen because evidence was either available during original RFE or postdated the petition filing, violating the requirement to establish eligibility at time of petition.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- High salary · New evidence submitted on motion was either reasonably available earlier or postdates filing; petitioner had notice and opportunity to provide during RFE.
- Membership · New evidence submitted on motion was either reasonably available earlier or postdates filing; petitioner had notice and opportunity to provide during RFE.
- Original contributions · New evidence submitted on motion was either reasonably available earlier or postdates filing; petitioner had notice and opportunity to provide during RFE.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 High salary | Not met | New evidence submitted on motion was either reasonably available earlier or postdates filing; petitioner had notice and opportunity to provide during RFE. |
 Membership | Not met | New evidence submitted on motion was either reasonably available earlier or postdates filing; petitioner had notice and opportunity to provide during RFE. |
 Original contributions | Not met | New evidence submitted on motion was either reasonably available earlier or postdates filing; petitioner had notice and opportunity to provide during RFE. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.