Outcome: Dismissed
MAR262021_09B2203
Our summary
A consultant claimed extraordinary ability based on original contributions, leading role, and high salary. The AAO found only the leading role criterion met, fell short of the three-criterion minimum, and dismissed the appeal without reaching final merits analysis.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Leading or critical role · Performed critical role for organization with distinguished reputation.
What was missing
- Awards · No major internationally recognized award established or claimed.
- High salary · Insufficient evidence of high salary; lacks comparative data for field.
- Original contributions · Contributions documented but lack evidence of major significance or field impact.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Performed critical role for organization with distinguished reputation. | |
| Not met | No major internationally recognized award established or claimed. | |
| Not met | Insufficient evidence of high salary; lacks comparative data for field. | |
| Not met | Contributions documented but lack evidence of major significance or field impact. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Did not meet three criteria; final merits determination not reached. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
