Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ABusiness and managementIndividualDecided March 2021Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

MAR262021_09B2203

Leading or critical roleMetAwardsNot metHigh salaryNot metOriginal contributionsNot metFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

A consultant claimed extraordinary ability based on original contributions, leading role, and high salary. The AAO found only the leading role criterion met, fell short of the three-criterion minimum, and dismissed the appeal without reaching final merits analysis.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Leading or critical role · Performed critical role for organization with distinguished reputation.

What was missing

  • Awards · No major internationally recognized award established or claimed.
  • High salary · Insufficient evidence of high salary; lacks comparative data for field.
  • Original contributions · Contributions documented but lack evidence of major significance or field impact.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Leading or critical roleMetPerformed critical role for organization with distinguished reputation.
AwardsNot metNo major internationally recognized award established or claimed.
High salaryNot metInsufficient evidence of high salary; lacks comparative data for field.
Original contributionsNot metContributions documented but lack evidence of major significance or field impact.
Final meritsNot reached / not discussedDid not meet three criteria; final merits determination not reached.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.