Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ABusiness and managementIndividualDecided May 2025Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

MAY222025_02B2203

AwardsNot metHigh salaryNot metMembershipNot metCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A real estate broker seeks extraordinary ability classification. She claimed membership and high salary criteria. The AAO affirmed denial because she did not receive a major award, did not meet three alternative criteria, and did not establish sustained national or international acclaim required for EB-1A.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · No major internationally recognized award received
  • High salary · No evidence of W-2 or earnings statements showing high salary relative to field
  • Membership · Associations do not require outstanding achievements as judged by experts
  • Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top of field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metNo major internationally recognized award received
High salaryNot metNo evidence of W-2 or earnings statements showing high salary relative to field
MembershipNot metAssociations do not require outstanding achievements as judged by experts
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedPetitioner did not claim this criterion
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedPetitioner did not claim this criterion
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedPetitioner did not claim this criterion
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedPetitioner did not claim this criterion
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPetitioner did not claim this criterion
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedPetitioner did not claim this criterion
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedPetitioner did not claim this criterion
Final meritsNot metRecord does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top of field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.