Outcome: Dismissed
MAY222025_02B2203
Our summary
A real estate broker seeks extraordinary ability classification. She claimed membership and high salary criteria. The AAO affirmed denial because she did not receive a major award, did not meet three alternative criteria, and did not establish sustained national or international acclaim required for EB-1A.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · No major internationally recognized award received
- High salary · No evidence of W-2 or earnings statements showing high salary relative to field
- Membership · Associations do not require outstanding achievements as judged by experts
- Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | No major internationally recognized award received | |
| Not met | No evidence of W-2 or earnings statements showing high salary relative to field | |
| Not met | Associations do not require outstanding achievements as judged by experts | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Petitioner did not claim this criterion | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Petitioner did not claim this criterion | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Petitioner did not claim this criterion | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Petitioner did not claim this criterion | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Petitioner did not claim this criterion | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Petitioner did not claim this criterion | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Petitioner did not claim this criterion | |
| Not met | Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
